Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 Benchmark, Test and specs
Last updated:
The Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 16 cores with 32 threads and is based on the 6. gen of the Intel Xeon E5 series. The processor uses a mainboard with the LGA 2011-3 socket and was released in Q1/2016.
CPU lineageThe segment in which we have classified the Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4. Here you can see if it is a desktop processor or a mobile processor or which processor may be the successor of the Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4. |
|
| Name: | Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
| Family: | Intel Xeon E5 |
| CPU group: | Intel Xeon E5 v4 |
| Segment: | Desktop / Server |
| Generation: | 6 |
| Predecessor: | Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 |
| Successor: | -- |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In addition to the number of CPU cores and threads, you can see here whether the Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 can be overclocked. You will also find the clock frequencies of the processor (single-core and multi-core) here. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor.
| CPU Cores / Threads: | 16 / 32 |
| Core architecture: | normal |
| Cores: | 16x |
| Hyperthreading / SMT: | Yes |
| Overclocking: | No |
| Frequency: | 2.60 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core): | 3.60 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (16 Cores): | 2.80 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the processor. The memory bandwidth depends on several factors and is given in gigabytes per second. |
|
| Memory type: | DDR4-2400 |
| Max. Memory: | |
| Memory channels: | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| Bandwidth: | -- |
| ECC: | Yes |
| PCIe: | 3.0 x 40 |
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal ManagementThe Thermal Design Power (TDP for short) specifies the necessary cooling solution to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually only gives a rough idea of the real consumption of a CPU. |
|
| TDP (PL1): | 145 W |
| TDP (PL2): | -- |
| TDP up: | -- |
| TDP down: | -- |
| Tjunction max.: | -- |
Technical details
Here you will find information on the size of the level 2 and level 3 cache of the Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 as well as a list of the processors ISA extensions. We have documented the architecture and the manufacturing technology for you as well as the release date.
| Technology: | 14 nm |
| Chip design: | Monolithic |
| Socket: | LGA 2011-3 |
| L2-Cache: | -- |
| L3-Cache: | 40.00 MB |
| Architecture: | Broadwell E |
| Operating systems: | Windows 10, Linux |
| Virtualization: | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Instruction set (ISA): | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions: | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date: | Q1/2016 |
| Release price: | 2890 $ |
| Part Number: | -- |
| Documents: | -- |
16C 32T @ 2.60 GHz (3.60 GHz)
buy now on Amazon and save!
Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Core i9-9900X
10C 20T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-12800H
14C 20T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
16C 32T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon E7-4890 v2
15C 30T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
8C 16T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i5-9400T
6C 6T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
20C 40T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
12C 24T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6146
12C 24T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
16C 32T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900X
10C 20T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-10700KF
8C 16T @ 4.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-10700K
8C 16T @ 4.90 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
8C 16T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-7660U
2C 4T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-8300H
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6150
18C 36T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
16C 32T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-7960X
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6152
22C 44T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6138F
20C 40T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Core i5-6500
4C 4T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
18C 36T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
22C 44T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i3-8145U
2C 4T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6140M
18C 36T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon W-2195
18C 36T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
16C 32T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6142
16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6142F
16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6142M
16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2022
leaderboard 2022
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2022
leaderboard 2022
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2022
leaderboard 2022
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2022
leaderboard 2022
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2022
leaderboard 2022
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2022
leaderboard 2022
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2022
leaderboard 2022
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2022
leaderboard 2022
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons
