Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 Benchmark, comparison and differences


Samsung Exynos 9611		Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU comparison Samsung Exynos 9611 or Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The Samsung Exynos 9611 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9611 was released in Q4/2018. The Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 14 cores with 28 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 was released in Q1/2016.

Samsung Exynos (46)	Family	Intel Xeon E5 (71)
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3)	CPU group	Intel Xeon E5 v4 (24)
3	Generation	6
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53	Architecture	Broadwell E
Mobile	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Samsung Exynos 9611 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 9611 is 2.30 GHz while the Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 14 CPU cores and 28 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 is at 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz).
Samsung Exynos 9611	Characteristic	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
8	Cores	14
8	Threads	28
hybrid (big.LITTLE)	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
No	Overclocking ?	No
2.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A73	A-Core	2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz)
1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53	B-Core	--
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Samsung Exynos 9611	Characteristic	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The Samsung Exynos 9611 or Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3	GPU	no iGPU
0.85 GHz	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
Bifrost 2	GPU Generation	--
16 nm	Technology
1	Max. displays
3	Compute units	--
48	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
2 GB	Max. GPU Memory	--
12	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3	GPU	no iGPU
Decode / Encode	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
Decode / Encode	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
Decode / Encode	Codec h264	No
Decode / Encode	Codec VP9	No
Decode / Encode	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec AVC	No
Decode / Encode	Codec VC-1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The Samsung Exynos 9611 can use up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 76.8 GB/s.
Samsung Exynos 9611	Characteristic	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
LPDDR4X-1600	Memory	DDR4-2400
	Max. Memory	1536 GB
0	Memory channels	4 (Quad Channel)
--	Max. Bandwidth	76.8 GB/s
No	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
--	L3 Cache	35.00 MB
--	PCIe version	3.0
--	PCIe lanes	40
--	PCIe Bandwidth	39.4 GB/s
Thermal Management The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Samsung Exynos 9611 is --, while the Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a TDP of 120 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
Samsung Exynos 9611	Characteristic	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
--	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	120 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The Samsung Exynos 9611 is manufactured in 10 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 35.00 MB cache.
Samsung Exynos 9611	Characteristic	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
10 nm	Technology	14 nm
Unknown	Chip design	Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
--	ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
--	Socket	LGA 2011-3
None	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No	AES-NI	Yes
Android	Operating systems	Windows 10, Linux
Q4/2018	Release date	Q1/2016
--	Release price	--

show more data		show more data

Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

Samsung Exynos 9611 (37%)

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks

Samsung Exynos 9611 (13%)

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	347 (39%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz	892 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	1277 (12%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz	10459 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	367 (34%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz	1069 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	1126 (14%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz	7966 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	2401 (13%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz	17951 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz	124 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz	695 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz	213 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz	3107 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz	94 (100%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 0.00 GHz	0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	179265 (100%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 2.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz	230 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz	138 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 9611 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz	2004 (100%)


1.		Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
2.		Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
3.		Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
4.		Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
5.		Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
6.		Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
7.		Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8.		Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
9.		Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
10.		Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4

CPU comparison with benchmarks

CPU comparison

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Internal Graphics

Hardware codec support

Memory & PCIe

Thermal Management

Technical details