Samsung Exynos 9610 vs. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9610 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
Samsung Exynos 9610 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
1.70 GHz Frequency 3.30 GHz
2.30 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 3.70 GHz
2.30 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 3.50 GHz
8 Cores 4
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU Intel HD Graphics P530
0.85 GHz GPU frequency 0.35 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 1.20 GHz
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation 9
16 nm Technology 14 nm
12 DirectX Version 12
1 Max. displays 3
3 Execution units 24
48 Shader 192
2 GB Max. GPU Memory
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode
Cortex-A73 + Cortex-A53 Architecture Skylake
LPDDR4X-1600 Memory DDR4-2133
0 Memory channels 2
Max. Memory
No ECC Yes
L2 Cache
L3 Cache 8.00 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 16
10 nm Technology 14 nm
ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
N/A Socket LGA 1151
TDP (PL1) 80W
Yes AES-NI Yes
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q4/2018 Release date Q4/2015
show more data show more data
Amazon
Amazon


Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
155 (100%)
Amazon



Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
568 (100%)
Amazon



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
329 (36%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
908 (100%)
Amazon



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
1164 (39%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
2951 (100%)
Amazon



iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (20%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
Intel HD Graphics P530 @ 1.20 GHz
461 (100%)
Amazon



AnTuTu 8 benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
171465 (100%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon



Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
616.6 (100%)
Amazon



Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
3944 (100%)
Amazon



Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
11499 (100%)
Amazon



Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
1.92 (100%)
Amazon



Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
6.19 (100%)
Amazon



Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
12.6 (100%)
Amazon



Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8x 1.70 GHz (2.30 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
4x 3.30 GHz (3.70 GHz)
7844 (100%)
Amazon



Devices using this processorDevices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9610 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Core i7-4790Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Core i7-4790 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
2. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
3. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i7-6700 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i7-6700
4. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i7-6700K Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i7-6700K
5. Intel Core i5-6500Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Core i5-6500 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
6. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
7. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i5-7400 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i5-7400
8. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i5-6600 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i5-6600
9. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
10. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i7-4790K Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i7-4790K
11. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i5-4460 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i5-4460
12. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i5-4430 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i5-4430
13. Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
14. Intel Core i5-6600KIntel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Core i5-6600K vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
15. Intel Pentium G4400Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Pentium G4400 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
16. Intel Core i5-6400Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Core i5-6400 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
17. Intel Core i3-6100Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
18. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5AMD Athlon II X4 750K Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs AMD Athlon II X4 750K
19. Intel Xeon E-2224GIntel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E-2224G vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
20. Intel Core i3-3220Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Core i3-3220 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
21. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i5-7500 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i5-7500
22. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
23. Intel Core i3-9100Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Core i3-9100 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
24. Intel Pentium Silver J5005Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 Intel Pentium Silver J5005 vs Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
25. Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5Intel Core i3-4130 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 vs Intel Core i3-4130


back to index
Facebook
Twitter