Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Intel Celeron J4005

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9610 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron J4005
Samsung Exynos 9610 Intel Celeron J4005

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 9610 or Intel Celeron J4005 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 was released in Q4/2018.

The Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron J4005 was released in Q4/2017.
Samsung Exynos (46) Family Intel Celeron (165)
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) CPU group Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11)
3 Generation 9
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Gemini Lake
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9610 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. The Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (2.70 GHz).

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Celeron J4005
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
A-Core 2.00 GHz (2.70 GHz)
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Celeron J4005
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU Intel UHD Graphics 600
0.85 GHz GPU frequency 0.25 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.70 GHz
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation 9.5
16 nm Technology 14 nm
1 Max. displays 3
3 Compute units 12
48 Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory 8 GB
12 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU Intel UHD Graphics 600
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Samsung Exynos 9610 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Intel Celeron J4005 can connect up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Celeron J4005
LPDDR4X-1600 Memory , DDR4-2400
Max. Memory 8 GB
0 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 38.4 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 4.00 MB
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes 6
-- PCIe Bandwidth 3.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Celeron J4005 is 10 W.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Celeron J4005
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 10 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. 105 °C

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Celeron J4005 cache has a total of 4.00 MB.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Celeron J4005
10 nm Technology 14 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-- Socket BGA 1090
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q4/2018 Release date Q4/2017
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9610 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron J4005 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
329 (70%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
472 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1164 (100%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
892 (77%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
370 (93%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
396 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1095 (100%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
687 (63%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (70%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
Intel UHD Graphics 600 @ 0.70 GHz
134 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
2235 (100%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
1595 (71%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
171465 (100%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
405 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
79 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
149 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9610 Intel Celeron J4005
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron J3455Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J3455 vs Intel Celeron J4005
2. Intel Pentium Silver J5005Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Pentium Silver J5005 vs Intel Celeron J4005
3. Intel Celeron J4005Intel Celeron J4125 Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Celeron J4125
4. Intel Celeron J4005Intel Celeron J4025 Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Celeron J4025
5. Intel Celeron J4005Intel Celeron J4105 Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Celeron J4105
6. Raspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711)Intel Celeron J4005 Raspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711) vs Intel Celeron J4005
7. Intel Celeron J4005Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Celeron J1900
8. Intel Celeron N4000Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Celeron J4005
9. Intel Celeron J4005Intel Core i3-7100U Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i3-7100U
10. Intel Celeron J4005Intel Celeron J3355 Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Celeron J3355


back to index