Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Intel Xeon W-3275

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9609 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon W-3275
Samsung Exynos 9609 Intel Xeon W-3275

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 9609 and the Intel Xeon W-3275 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Samsung Exynos 9609 8 core processor released in Q2/2019 with the Intel Xeon W-3275 which has 28 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2019.
Samsung Exynos (46) Family Intel Xeon W (83)
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) CPU group Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17)
3 Generation 7
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Cascade Lake W
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor Intel Xeon W-3175X
-- Successor Intel Xeon W-3375

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9609 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Intel Xeon W-3275 clocks with 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz), has 28 CPU cores and can calculate 56 threads in parallel.

Samsung Exynos 9609 Characteristic Intel Xeon W-3275
8 Cores 28
8 Threads 56
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.20 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
A-Core 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz)
1.60 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 9609 Characteristic Intel Xeon W-3275
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU no iGPU
0.85 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation --
16 nm Technology
1 Max. displays
3 Compute units --
48 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 9609, while the Intel Xeon W-3275 supports a maximum of 1024 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 140.7 GB/s enabled.

Samsung Exynos 9609 Characteristic Intel Xeon W-3275
LPDDR4X-1600 Memory DDR4-2933
Max. Memory 1024 GB
0 Memory channels 6 (Hexa Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 140.7 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 38.50 MB
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 64
-- PCIe Bandwidth 63.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Samsung Exynos 9609 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Xeon W-3275 is 205 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Samsung Exynos 9609 Characteristic Intel Xeon W-3275
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 205 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9609 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 10 nm. The cache of Intel Xeon W-3275 is at 38.50 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

Samsung Exynos 9609 Characteristic Intel Xeon W-3275
10 nm Technology 14 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
-- Socket LGA 3647
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2019 Release date Q2/2019
-- Release price 4250 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9609 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon W-3275 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9609 (27%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9609 (5%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
319 (27%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz
1203 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1139 (5%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz
21369 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz
1107 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz
28051 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz
1414 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz
437 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz
11020 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (100%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
185205 (100%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9609 Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz
44831 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9609 Intel Xeon W-3275
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990XIntel Xeon W-3275 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
2. Intel Core i9-12900KIntel Xeon W-3275 Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Xeon W-3275
3. Intel Xeon W-3275MIntel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Xeon W-3275
4. Samsung Exynos 9609Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
5. Intel Xeon W-3175XIntel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GSamsung Exynos 9609 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs Samsung Exynos 9609
7. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WXIntel Xeon W-3275 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Intel Xeon W-3275
8. Samsung Exynos 9609Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
9. AMD Ryzen 9 3950XIntel Xeon W-3275 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
10. Intel Xeon W-3275AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Intel Xeon W-3275 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X


back to index