Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Xeon W-3275 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 9609 and the Intel Xeon W-3275 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Samsung Exynos 9609 8 core processor released in Q2/2019 with the Intel Xeon W-3275 which has 28 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2019. |
||
Samsung Exynos (46) | Family | Intel Xeon W (83) |
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) | CPU group | Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) |
3 | Generation | 7 |
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Cascade Lake W |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
-- | Predecessor | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
-- | Successor | Intel Xeon W-3375 |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 9609 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Intel Xeon W-3275 clocks with 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz), has 28 CPU cores and can calculate 56 threads in parallel. |
||
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
8 | Cores | 28 |
8 | Threads | 56 |
hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
A-Core | 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) |
1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU | no iGPU |
0.85 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
-- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
Bifrost 2 | GPU Generation | -- |
16 nm | Technology | |
1 | Max. displays | |
3 | Compute units | -- |
48 | Shader | -- |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU | no iGPU |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
No | Codec AV1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 9609, while the Intel Xeon W-3275 supports a maximum of 1024 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 140.7 GB/s enabled. |
||
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
LPDDR4X-1600 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
Max. Memory | 1024 GB | |
0 | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
-- | Max. Bandwidth | 140.7 GB/s |
No | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
-- | L3 Cache | 38.50 MB |
-- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
-- | PCIe lanes | 64 |
-- | PCIe Bandwidth | 63.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe Samsung Exynos 9609 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Xeon W-3275 is 205 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
-- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 205 W |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
-- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 9609 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 10 nm. The cache of Intel Xeon W-3275 is at 38.50 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm. |
||
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
10 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
-- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
-- | Socket | LGA 3647 |
None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
No | AES-NI | Yes |
Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
Q2/2019 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
-- | Release price | 4250 $ |
show more data | show more data | |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
@ 0.00 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
Unknown | Unknown |