Samsung Exynos 9609 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 9609 and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Samsung Exynos 9609 8 core processor released in Q2/2019 with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X which has 16 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2018. |
||
Samsung Exynos (46) | Family | AMD Ryzen Threadripper (13) |
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) | CPU group | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000 (4) |
3 | Generation | 2 |
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Colfax (Zen+) |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
-- | Predecessor | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
-- | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 9609 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X clocks with 3.50 GHz (4.40 GHz), has 16 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel. |
||
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
A-Core | 3.50 GHz (4.40 GHz) |
1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU | no iGPU |
0.85 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
-- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
Bifrost 2 | GPU Generation | -- |
16 nm | Technology | |
1 | Max. displays | |
3 | Compute units | -- |
48 | Shader | -- |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU | no iGPU |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
No | Codec AV1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 9609, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 93.8 GB/s enabled. |
||
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
LPDDR4X-1600 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
Max. Memory | ||
0 | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
-- | Max. Bandwidth | 93.8 GB/s |
No | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | 8.00 MB |
-- | L3 Cache | 32.00 MB |
-- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
-- | PCIe lanes | 64 |
-- | PCIe Bandwidth | 63.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe Samsung Exynos 9609 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 180 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
-- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 180 W |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
-- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 9609 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 10 nm. The cache of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is at 40.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 12 nm. |
||
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
10 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
-- | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
-- | Socket | TR4 (SP3r2) |
None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
No | AES-NI | Yes |
Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
Q2/2019 | Release date | Q3/2018 |
-- | Release price | 899 $ |
show more data | show more data | |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
@ 0.00 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
Unknown | Unknown |