Samsung Exynos 880 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 880 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Samsung Exynos 880 AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 880 and the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Samsung Exynos 880 8 core processor released in Q2/2020 with the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2019.
Samsung Exynos (46) Family AMD Ryzen 7 (67)
Samsung Exynos 800 (2) CPU group AMD Ryzen 3000 (15)
4 Generation 3
Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 Architecture Matisse (Zen 2)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 880 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X clocks with 3.90 GHz (4.50 GHz), has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel.

Samsung Exynos 880 Characteristic AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8 Cores 8
8 Threads 16
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? Yes
2.00 GHz
2x Cortex-A77
A-Core 3.90 GHz (4.50 GHz)
1.80 GHz
6x Cortex-A55
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 880 Characteristic AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-G76 MP5 GPU no iGPU
0.72 GHz GPU frequency --
0.72 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 3 GPU Generation --
7 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
5 Compute units --
80 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G76 MP5 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 880, while the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X supports a maximum of 128 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled.

Samsung Exynos 880 Characteristic AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
LPDDR4X Memory DDR4-3200
Max. Memory 128 GB
0 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 32.00 MB
-- PCIe version 4.0
-- PCIe lanes 20
-- PCIe Bandwidth 39.4 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Samsung Exynos 880 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X is 105 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Samsung Exynos 880 Characteristic AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 105 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. 95 °C

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 880 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 8 nm. The cache of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X is at 32.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm.

Samsung Exynos 880 Characteristic AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8 nm Technology 7 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
-- Socket AM4 (PGA 1331)
None Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q2/2020 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price 385 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 880 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.0 stars (3 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 880 (51%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 880 (20%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
645 (51%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz
1271 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
1830 (20%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
9065 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz
76 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz
712 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz
1325 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
12874 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz
1742 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
7965 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz
509 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
4960 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 @ 0.72 GHz
260 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
287445 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
182 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
23322 (100%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
167.6 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
517 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz
5544 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz
209 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 880 Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz
2165 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 880 AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Unknown dercomputerladen PC mit Ryzen 7 3800X
Memory PC mit Ryzen 7 3800X

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Ryzen 5 5600XAMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
2. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XAMD Ryzen 7 5800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
3. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XAMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
4. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XTAMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
5. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XIntel Core i7-10700K AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i7-10700K
6. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XAMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
7. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XIntel Core i7-9700K AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i7-9700K
8. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XIntel Core i9-9900K AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i9-9900K
9. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XAMD Ryzen 9 5900X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
10. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XAMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X


back to index