Samsung Exynos 5410 vs AMD EPYC 7662

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 5410 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7662
Samsung Exynos 5410 AMD EPYC 7662

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 5410 and the AMD EPYC 7662 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Samsung Exynos 5410 8 core processor released in Q2/2013 with the AMD EPYC 7662 which has 64 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2020.
Samsung Exynos (46) Family AMD EPYC (129)
Samsung Exynos 5260/5410/5420/5422/5800 (5) CPU group AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
3 Generation 2
Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 Architecture Rome (Zen 2)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor AMD EPYC 7763

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 5410 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 7662 clocks with 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz), has 64 CPU cores and can calculate 128 threads in parallel.

Samsung Exynos 5410 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7662
8 Cores 64
8 Threads 128
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
1.60 GHz
4x Cortex-A15
A-Core 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz)
1.20 GHz
4x Cortex-A7
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 5410 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7662
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

PowerVR SGX544 MP3 GPU no iGPU
0.53 GHz GPU frequency --
0.53 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
45nm Technology
1 Max. displays
6 Compute units --
12 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
10.1 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

PowerVR SGX544 MP3 GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
Decode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 5410, while the AMD EPYC 7662 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled.

Samsung Exynos 5410 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7662
LPDDR3-800 Memory DDR4-3200
Max. Memory
0 Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
2.50 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 256.00 MB
-- PCIe version 4.0
-- PCIe lanes 128
-- PCIe Bandwidth 252.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Samsung Exynos 5410 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 7662 is 225 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Samsung Exynos 5410 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7662
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 225 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 5410 has 2.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 7662 is at 256.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm.

Samsung Exynos 5410 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7662
28 nm Technology 7 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
Armv7-A (32 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
AM1 Socket SP3
None Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2013 Release date Q1/2020
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 5410 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7662 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 5410 Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz
1046 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 5410 Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
33944 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 5410 Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz
386 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 5410 Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
18203 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 5410 Samsung Exynos 5410
PowerVR SGX544 MP3 @ 0.53 GHz
51 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 5410 Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
73144 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 5410 AMD EPYC 7662
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 7742AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD EPYC 7662
2. AMD EPYC 7702PAMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 7662
3. AMD EPYC 7662AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7702
4. AMD EPYC 7662Intel Xeon Gold 5218 AMD EPYC 7662 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5218
5. Intel Xeon Silver 4216AMD EPYC 7662 Intel Xeon Silver 4216 vs AMD EPYC 7662
6. Intel Xeon Gold 6252NAMD EPYC 7662 Intel Xeon Gold 6252N vs AMD EPYC 7662
7. AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505GAMD EPYC 7662 AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G vs AMD EPYC 7662
8. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3AMD EPYC 7662 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs AMD EPYC 7662
9. AMD EPYC 7662Intel Pentium 3825U AMD EPYC 7662 vs Intel Pentium 3825U
10. AMD EPYC 7662Intel Core i5-9600T AMD EPYC 7662 vs Intel Core i5-9600T


back to index