Samsung Exynos 5410 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 5410 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 5410 and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Samsung Exynos 5410 8 core processor released in Q2/2013 with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 which has 6 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2017. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (46) | Family | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28) |
| Samsung Exynos 5260/5410/5420/5422/5800 (5) | CPU group | AMD Ryzen 1000 (15) |
| 3 | Generation | 1 |
| Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 | Architecture | Summit Ridge (Zen) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 5410 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 clocks with 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz), has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 12 threads in parallel. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5410 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A15 |
A-Core | 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) |
| 1.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A7 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| PowerVR SGX544 MP3 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| 45nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 6 | Compute units | -- |
| 12 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 10.1 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| PowerVR SGX544 MP3 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 5410, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports a maximum of 64 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s enabled. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5410 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| LPDDR3-800 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 2.50 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 19.7 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe Samsung Exynos 5410 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is 95 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5410 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 95 °C |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 5410 has 2.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is at 16.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5410 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| AM1 | Socket | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2013 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| -- | Release price | 300 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
6C 12T @ 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
PowerVR SGX544 MP3 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5410
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 5410 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
