Samsung Exynos 3475 vs Intel Core i9-10900
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Intel Core i9-10900 | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 3475 or Intel Core i9-10900 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 3475 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 3475 was released in 2015. The Intel Core i9-10900 has 10 cores with 20 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i9-10900 was released in Q2/2020. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (46) | Family | Intel Core i9 (78) |
| Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) | CPU group | Intel Core i 10000 (43) |
| 3 | Generation | 10 |
| Cortex-A7 | Architecture | Comet Lake S |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | Intel Core i9-9900 |
| -- | Successor | Intel Core i9-11900 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 3475 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.30 GHz. The Intel Core i9-10900 has 10 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz (5.20 GHz). |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-10900 |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 5.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 4.60 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.35 GHz |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.20 GHz |
| Midgard 3 | GPU Generation | 9.5 |
| 28nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 3 |
| 1 | Compute units | 24 |
| 16 | Shader | 192 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 3475 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Intel Core i9-10900 can connect up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-10900 |
| LPDDR3-400 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 20.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 3475 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Core i9-10900 is 65 W. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-10900 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 3475 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Core i9-10900 cache has a total of 20.00 MB. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-10900 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 1200 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| 2015 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
| -- | Release price | 439 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
10C 20T @ 2.80 GHz (5.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i9-10900
Intel UHD Graphics 630 @ 1.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-10900
10C 20T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Intel Core i9-10900 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
