Samsung Exynos 3250 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Last updated: 2023-09-12

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 3250		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
CPU comparison In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 3250 and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster. We compare the Samsung Exynos 3250 2 core processor released in 2014 with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2018.

Samsung Exynos (46)	Family	AMD Ryzen 7 (67)
Samsung Exynos 3200 (1)	CPU group	AMD Ryzen 2000 (9)
3	Generation	2
Cortex-A7	Architecture	Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+)
Mobile	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Samsung Exynos 3250 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.00 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X clocks with 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz), has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel.
Samsung Exynos 3250	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
2	Cores	8
2	Threads	16
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
No	Overclocking ?	Yes
1.00 GHz	Frequency	3.70 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	4.30 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	3.85 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Samsung Exynos 3250	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.
ARM Mali-400 MP2	GPU	no iGPU
0.45 GHz	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
Utgard	GPU Generation	--
28nm	Technology
1	Max. displays
2	Compute units	--
32	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
0	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
ARM Mali-400 MP2	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 3250, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X supports a maximum of 64 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s enabled.
Samsung Exynos 3250	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
LPDDR2-400	Memory	DDR4-2933
	Max. Memory	64 GB
0	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
--	Max. Bandwidth	46.9 GB/s
No	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
--	L3 Cache	16.00 MB
--	PCIe version	3.0
--	PCIe lanes	20
--	PCIe Bandwidth	19.7 GB/s
Thermal Management The Samsung Exynos 3250 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is 105 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.
Samsung Exynos 3250	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
--	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	105 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	95 °C
Technical details The Samsung Exynos 3250 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is at 16.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 12 nm.
Samsung Exynos 3250	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
28 nm	Technology	12 nm
Unknown	Chip design	Chiplet
Armv7-A (32 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
--	ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
--	Socket	AM4 (PGA 1331)
None	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
No	AES-NI	Yes
Android	Operating systems	Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
2014	Release date	Q2/2018
--	Release price	320 $

show more data		show more data

Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	66 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	589 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	1071 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	9971 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	1062 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	7100 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	1294 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	6789 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	411 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	3951 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 ARM Mali-400 MP2 @ 0.45 GHz	8 (100%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X @ 0.00 GHz	0 (0%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	156 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	17588 (100%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	211.2 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	457 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz	4799 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	177 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 3250 2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	1817 (100%)

Devices using this processor
Samsung Exynos 3250	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Samsung Google Nexus S Samsung Galaxy S 4G	Captiva Workstation PC Ryzen 7 2700X Acer Nitro N50-100 Ryzen 7 2700X HP EliteDesk 705 G4 Workstation Edition MT Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (6TL46EA#ABD)

News and articles for the Samsung Exynos 3250 and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

The evolution of AMD Ryzen processors

Posted by Stefan on 2022-09-06

The AMD Ryzen processors are designed for the mid to high-end range and are grouped into the Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 classes. AMD follows the market leader Intel, which groups its Core i series (Intel Core i3, Core i5, Core i7 and Core i9) identically.

The AMD Ryzen processors were first introduced by AMD in Q1 2017. They are the successor to the not particularly successful AMD Bulldozer processors. The latter were manufactured using an outdated manufacturing process and could not keep up with the competing products from Intel. AMD lost a large portion of its desktop processor market share during this period.

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
2.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
3.		AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
4.		AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
5.		AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
6.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-8700K
7.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700
8.		AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
9.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-9700K
10.		AMD Ryzen 7 5700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X