Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple A16 Bionic

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU1 vs CPU2 Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2200 Apple A16 Bionic

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 2200 or Apple A16 Bionic - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. Up to 12 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 was released in Q1/2022.

The Apple A16 Bionic has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.46 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Apple A16 Bionic was released in Q3/2022.
Samsung Exynos (46) Family Apple A series (22)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (1) CPU group Apple A16 (1)
6 Generation 16
Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510 Architecture A16
Mobile Segment Mobile
Samsung Exynos 2100 Predecessor Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
-- Successor Apple A17 Pro

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is 2.80 GHz while the Apple A16 Bionic has 6 CPU cores and 6 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Apple A16 Bionic is at 3.46 GHz.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Apple A16 Bionic
8 Cores 6
8 Threads 6
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.80 GHz
1x Cortex-X2
A-Core 3.46 GHz
2x Everest
2.52 GHz
3x Cortex-A710
B-Core 2.02 GHz
4x Sawtooth
1.82 GHz
4x Cortex-A510
C-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Apple A16 Bionic
-- AI hardware Apple Neural Engine
-- AI specifications 16 Neural cores @ 17 TOPS

Internal Graphics

The Samsung Exynos 2200 or Apple A16 Bionic has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores)
1.30 GHz GPU frequency 1.34 GHz
1.30 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
1 GPU Generation 13
4 nm Technology 4 nm
0 Max. displays 3
24 Compute units 20
384 Shader 640
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory 6 GB
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores)
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Samsung Exynos 2200 can use up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The Apple A16 Bionic supports up to 6 GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Apple A16 Bionic
LPDDR5-6400 Memory LPDDR5-6400
12 GB Max. Memory 6 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache 20.00 MB
-- L3 Cache 24.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is --, while the Apple A16 Bionic has a TDP of 7.25 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Apple A16 Bionic
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 7.25 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 2200 is manufactured in 4 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Apple A16 Bionic is manufactured in 4 nm and has a 44.00 MB cache.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Apple A16 Bionic
4 nm Technology 4 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
Armv9-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8.6-A (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems iOS
Q1/2022 Release date Q3/2022
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 2200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.2 stars (12 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Apple A16 Bionic to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.4 stars (25 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 2200 (60%)
Apple A16 Bionic (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 2200 (73%)
Apple A16 Bionic (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1182 (63%)
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.46 GHz
1890 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3586 (66%)
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.46 GHz
5465 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1428 (56%)
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.46 GHz
2531 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3528 (56%)
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.46 GHz
6299 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz
1422 (79%)
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores) @ 1.34 GHz
1789 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
917364 (97%)
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.46 GHz
947502 (100%)

Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
6C 6T @ 3.46 GHz
17 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 2200 Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

News and articles for the Samsung Exynos 2200 and the Apple A16 Bionic


Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Apple A16 BionicApple M1 Apple A16 Bionic vs Apple M1
2. Apple A16 BionicApple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) Apple A16 Bionic vs Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
3. Apple A16 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
4. Apple A16 BionicApple M2 Apple A16 Bionic vs Apple M2
5. Apple A17 ProApple A16 Bionic Apple A17 Pro vs Apple A16 Bionic
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
7. Samsung Exynos 2200Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
8. Apple A16 BionicApple A14 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic vs Apple A14 Bionic
9. Apple A16 BionicApple A13 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic vs Apple A13 Bionic
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Apple A16 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs Apple A16 Bionic


back to index