Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546

CPU comparison

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 or AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.82 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 was released in Q3/2014.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.95 GHz. The CPU supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 was released in Q4/2020.
Qualcomm Snapdragon Family AMD Ryzen Embedded V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808/810 CPU group AMD Ryzen Embedded V2000
2 Generation 2
Cortex-A57 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Grey Hawk (Zen 2)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 6 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 is 1.82 GHz while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 has 6 CPU cores and 12 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 is at 1.44 GHz.

6 Cores 6
6 Threads 12
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
1.82 GHz
2x Cortex-A57
A-Core 3.00 GHz (3.95 GHz)
1.44 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --
-- C-Core --

Internal Graphics

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 or AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

Qualcomm Adreno 418 GPU AMD Radeon 6 Graphics (Renoir)
0.60 GHz GPU frequency 1.50 GHz
0.60 GHz GPU (Turbo)
4 GPU Generation 9
20 nm Technology 7 nm
0 Max. displays 3
Execution units 6
128 Shader 384
Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
11 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.

LPDDR3-933 Memory DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-3200
Max. Memory 64 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
L2 Cache 3.00 MB
L3 Cache 8.00 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 20

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 is --, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 has a TDP of 45 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 45 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up 35 W
-- TDP down 54 W
-- Tjunction max. 105 °C

Technical details

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 is manufactured in 20 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache.

20 nm Technology 7 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
-- Socket FP6
None Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q3/2014 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price --
show more data show more data



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
6C 6T @ 1.82 GHz
237 (21%)
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
6C 12T @ 3.95 GHz
1156 (100%)
Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core) results



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
6C 6T @ 1.82 GHz
675 (9%)
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
6C 12T @ 3.00 GHz
7647 (100%)
Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core) results



iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
Qualcomm Adreno 418 @ 0.60 GHz
154 (13%)
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
AMD Radeon 6 Graphics (Renoir) @ 1.50 GHz
1152 (100%)
Show all iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS) results



Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
6C 6T @ 1.82 GHz
1234 (100%)
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
6C 12T @ 3.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Show all Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark results



Devices using this processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
Unknown Unknown

Leaderboards

In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.


Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 808Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GQualcomm Snapdragon 808 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 808Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GQualcomm Snapdragon 808 Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 808Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GQualcomm Snapdragon 808 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 808Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GQualcomm Snapdragon 808 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
9. Apple A8Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 Apple A8 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 808Apple A14 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 vs Apple A14 Bionic
11. Apple M1AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 Apple M1 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
12. Qualcomm Snapdragon 808Intel Atom x6413E Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 vs Intel Atom x6413E
13. Qualcomm Snapdragon 808Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
14. Apple A12 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 808 Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
15. HiSilicon Kirin 620Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808


back to index