Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Intel Celeron 3965U

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron 3965U
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Intel Celeron 3965U

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 and the Intel Celeron 3965U and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 8 core processor released in Q3/2020 with the Intel Celeron 3965U which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2017.
Qualcomm Snapdragon (102) Family Intel Celeron (165)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 760 (3) CPU group Intel Celeron 3000 (10)
3 Generation 7
Kryo 475 Architecture Kaby Lake U
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron 3965U clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3965U
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.30 GHz
1x Kryo 475 Prime
A-Core 2.20 GHz
2.20 GHz
1x Kryo 475 Gold
B-Core --
1.80 GHz
6x Kryo 475 Silver
C-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3965U
Qualcomm AI engine AI hardware --
Hexagon 696 @ 5.5 TOPS AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Qualcomm Adreno 620 GPU Intel HD Graphics 610
0.63 GHz GPU frequency 0.30 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.90 GHz
6 GPU Generation 9.5
7 nm Technology 14 nm
2 Max. displays 3
-- Compute units 12
192 Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory 32 GB
12.1 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Qualcomm Adreno 620 GPU Intel HD Graphics 610
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 12 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, while the Intel Celeron 3965U supports a maximum of 32 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s enabled.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3965U
LPDDR4-3733 Memory LPDDR3-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600
12 GB Max. Memory 32 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
14.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 34.1 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes 10
-- PCIe Bandwidth 5.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 has a TDP of 5 W. The TDP of the Intel Celeron 3965U is 15 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3965U
5 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 15 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down 10 W
-- Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron 3965U is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3965U
7 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-- Socket BGA 1356
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2020 Release date Q1/2017
-- Release price 107 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 3965U to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (4 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U (77%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U (54%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
611 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
560 (92%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1765 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
1084 (61%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
774 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
469 (61%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1772 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
832 (47%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
Qualcomm Adreno 620 @ 0.63 GHz
490 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
Intel HD Graphics 610 @ 0.90 GHz
173 (35%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
288740 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
1732 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
86 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
168 (100%)

Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
5.5 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Intel Celeron 3965U
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
2. Intel Celeron 3965UIntel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron 3965U vs Intel Celeron J1900
3. Intel Celeron J4125Intel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron J4125 vs Intel Celeron 3965U
4. Intel Celeron 3865UIntel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron 3965U
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
7. MediaTek Helio G96Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GQualcomm Snapdragon 765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
10. Intel Celeron 3965UIntel Core i3-7100U Intel Celeron 3965U vs Intel Core i3-7100U


back to index