Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Google Tensor G2
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
8C / 8T · 1.80 GHz
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
8C / 8T · 1.80 GHz
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
8C / 8T · 1.80 GHz
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
8C / 8T · 1.80 GHz
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Google Tensor G2
100 %
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) | Google Tensor (5) |
| CPU group | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (1) | Google Tensor G2 (1) |
| Architecture | Kryo 250 | G2 |
| Technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Google Tensor | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Kryo 250 Gold 1.80 GHz |
2x Cortex-X1 2.85 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Kryo 250 Silver 1.80 GHz |
2x Cortex-A78 2.35 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Qualcomm Adreno 506 | ARM Mali-G710 MP7 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 0.60 GHz | 0.90 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | / 96 | 7 / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 0 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2015 | Q2/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | Google Tensor AI |
| AI specifications | Hexagon 546 | Google Edge TPU @ 4 TOPS |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-1866 (7.5 GB/s) | LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q3/2018 | Q4/2022 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is 1.8 stars (4 ratings), while Google Tensor G2 has received 4.0 stars (86 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
