Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Intel Core2 Duo E4500
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.10 GHz
2C / 2T · 2.20 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.10 GHz
2C / 2T · 2.20 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Mediatek Dimensity (38) | Intel Core2 Duo (29) |
| CPU group | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 4nm (1) | Intel Core 2 Duo E4000/E6000 (15) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A78 / -A78 / -A55 | Conroe (Core) |
| Technology | 4 nm | 65 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 775 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 1x Cortex-A78 3.10 GHz |
2x 2.20 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 3x Cortex-A78 3.00 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 2.00 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G610 MP6 | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | 6 / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 4 nm | |
| Release date | Q2/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) DDR2-1066 (17.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | |
| Release date | Q4/2022 | Q3/2007 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is 4.3 stars (53 ratings), while Intel Core2 Duo E4500 has received 5.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core2 Duo E4500
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
