Intel Xeon W-3275M vs. Samsung Exynos 1080

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon W-3275M CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 1080
Intel Xeon W-3275M Samsung Exynos 1080
2.50 GHz Frequency 2.00 GHz
4.60 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 2.80 GHz
3.40 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 2.60 GHz
28 Cores 8
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
normal Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
GPU ARM Mali-G78 MP10
GPU frequency 0.76 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
GPU Generation Vallhall 2
Technology 5 nm
DirectX Version 12
Max. displays 1
Execution units 10
Shader 160
Max. GPU Memory
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode
Cascade Lake SP Architecture Cortex-A78/Cortex-A55
DDR4-2933 Memory LPDDR4X, LPDDR5
6 Memory channels 4
2048 GB Max. Memory
Yes ECC No
L2 Cache
38.50 MB L3 Cache
3.0 PCIe version
64 PCIe lanes
14 nm Technology 5 nm
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
LGA 3647 Socket N/A
205W TDP (PL1)
Yes AES-NI Yes
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro Virtualization None
Q2/2019 Release date Q4/2020
show more data show more data


Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
28x 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT
1107 (100%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
8x 2.00 GHz (2.80 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon



Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
28x 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT
28051 (100%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
8x 2.00 GHz (2.80 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon



Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
28x 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT
437 (100%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
8x 2.00 GHz (2.80 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon



Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
28x 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT
11020 (100%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
8x 2.00 GHz (2.80 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
28x 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT
1096 (100%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
8x 2.00 GHz (2.80 GHz)
903 (82%)
Amazon



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
28x 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT
17196 (100%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
8x 2.00 GHz (2.80 GHz)
3343 (19%)
Amazon



iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
--
0 (0%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
ARM Mali-G78 MP10 @ 0.76 GHz
972 (100%)
Amazon



AnTuTu 8 benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
28x 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT
0 (0%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
8x 2.00 GHz (2.80 GHz)
688300 (100%)
Amazon



Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
28x 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT
36622 (100%)
Amazon
Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 1080
8x 2.00 GHz (2.80 GHz)
0 (0%)
Amazon



Devices using this processorDevices using this processor

Intel Xeon W-3275M Samsung Exynos 1080
Apple Mac Pro (2019) Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Samsung Exynos 2100Samsung Exynos 1080 Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 1080
2. Intel Xeon W-3275MAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
3. Intel Xeon W-3275MIntel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Xeon W-3275
4. Samsung Exynos 1080Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Samsung Exynos 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
5. Intel Xeon W-3275MAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
6. AMD Ryzen 9 5950XIntel Xeon W-3275M AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs Intel Xeon W-3275M
7. Samsung Exynos 1080Apple A14 Bionic Samsung Exynos 1080 vs Apple A14 Bionic
8. AMD Epyc 7742Intel Xeon W-3275M AMD Epyc 7742 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M
9. Intel Xeon W-3275MIntel Xeon W-3265M Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Xeon W-3265M
10. Intel Xeon W-3175XIntel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Xeon W-3275M
11. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 1080 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 1080
12. Samsung Exynos 1080Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung Exynos 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
13. Intel Xeon W-3275MAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
14. Samsung Exynos 1080Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 1080 vs Samsung Exynos 990
15. Intel Xeon W-3275MAMD Ryzen 9 3950X Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
16. Intel Xeon W-3223Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3223 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M
17. Intel Xeon W-3245Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3245 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M
18. Apple M1Intel Xeon W-3275M Apple M1 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M
19. Intel Xeon W-3275MIntel Xeon W-3235 Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Xeon W-3235
20. Intel Xeon W-3275MIntel Xeon E5-1650 v3 Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
21. Samsung Exynos 1080Apple M1 Samsung Exynos 1080 vs Apple M1
22. Intel Xeon W-3275MAMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
23. Intel Xeon W-3275MAMD E2-3800 Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD E2-3800
24. Intel Xeon W-3275MAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
25. Intel Xeon Gold 6222VIntel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon Gold 6222V vs Intel Xeon W-3275M


back to index
Facebook
Twitter