Intel Xeon W-3225 vs Intel Core i5-2537M
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3225 | Intel Core i5-2537M | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3225 or Intel Core i5-2537M - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3225 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.40 GHz. Up to 1024 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3225 was released in Q2/2019. The Intel Core i5-2537M has 2 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i5-2537M was released in Q1/2011. |
||
| Intel Xeon W | Family | Intel Core i5 |
| Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 | CPU group | Intel Core i 2000M |
| 7 | Generation | 2 |
| Cascade Lake W | Architecture | Sandy Bridge H |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| Intel Xeon w5-3425 | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3225 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3225 is 3.70 GHz (4.40 GHz) while the Intel Core i5-2537M has 2 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Core i5-2537M is at --. |
||
| 8 | Cores | 2 |
| 16 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.70 GHz | Frequency | 1.40 GHz |
| 4.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 2.30 GHz |
| 4.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Xeon W-3225 or Intel Core i5-2537M has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 GHz | |
| GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz | |
| GPU Generation | 6 | |
| Technology | 32 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Execution units | 12 | |
| Shader | 96 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| DirectX Version | 10.1 | |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3225 can use up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 128.1 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-2537M supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 21.3 GB/s. |
||
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR3-1333 |
| 1024 GB | Max. Memory | 8 GB |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| L2 Cache | ||
| 16.50 MB | L3 Cache | 3.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 2.0 |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon W-3225 is 160 W, while the Intel Core i5-2537M has a TDP of 17 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| 160 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 17 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3225 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 16.50 MB cache. The Intel Core i5-2537M is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 16.50 MB cache. |
||
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | BGA 1023 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q1/2011 |
| 1199 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz (4.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 4T @ 1.40 GHz (2.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i5-2537M
2C 4T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-2537M
2C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-2537M
2C 4T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-2537M
2C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-2537M
2C 4T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-2537M
2C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-2537M
Intel HD Graphics 3000 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-2537M
2C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3225 | Intel Core i5-2537M |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
