Intel Xeon w9-3495X vs AMD EPYC 9174F
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon w9-3495X | AMD EPYC 9174F | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon w9-3495X or AMD EPYC 9174F - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon w9-3495X has 56 cores with 112 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.80 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The Intel Xeon w9-3495X was released in Q1/2023. The AMD EPYC 9174F has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9174F was released in Q4/2022. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon W-3400 (8) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 9004 (21) |
| 12 | Generation | 4 |
| Sapphire Rapids-WS | Architecture | Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | AMD EPYC 9175F |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon w9-3495X is a 56 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.90 GHz (4.80 GHz). The AMD EPYC 9174F has 16 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 4.10 GHz (4.40 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon w9-3495X | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9174F |
| 56 | Cores | 16 |
| 112 | Threads | 32 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.90 GHz | Frequency | 4.10 GHz |
| 4.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.40 GHz |
| 2.90 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 4.15 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon w9-3495X supports a maximum of 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9174F can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon w9-3495X | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9174F |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | DDR5-4800 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | 6144 GB |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 12 |
| 307.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| 105.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 112 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 441.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon w9-3495X has a TDP of 350 W, that of the AMD EPYC 9174F is 320 W. |
||
| Intel Xeon w9-3495X | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9174F |
| 350 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 320 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 420 W | TDP up | 400 W |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 99 °C | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon w9-3495X has a 105.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 9174F cache has a total of 272.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon w9-3495X | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9174F |
| 10 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, AMX | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| LGA 4677 | Socket | SP5 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, VT-rp, vPro Enterprise | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 11, Windows Server, Linux | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q1/2023 | Release date | Q4/2022 |
| 5889 $ | Release price | 3850 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
56C 112T @ 1.90 GHz (4.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz (4.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
56C 112T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon w9-3495X | AMD EPYC 9174F |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
