Intel Xeon w5-3535X vs AMD EPYC 9174F

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Xeon w5-3535X and the AMD EPYC 9174F and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Xeon w5-3535X 20 core processor released in Q3/2024 with the AMD EPYC 9174F which has 16 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2022.

The Intel Xeon w5-3535X is a 20 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.90 GHz (4.80 GHz). The processor can compute 40 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 9174F clocks with 4.10 GHz (4.40 GHz), has 16 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel.

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Up to 4096 GB of memory in a maximum of 8 memory channels is supported by the Intel Xeon w5-3535X, while the AMD EPYC 9174F supports a maximum of 6144 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 460.8 GB/s enabled.

The Intel Xeon w5-3535X has a TDP of 300 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 9174F is 320 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

The Intel Xeon w5-3535X has 52.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 10 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 9174F is at 272.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 5 nm.