Intel Xeon Gold 5215 vs AMD EPYC 7343
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5215 | AMD EPYC 7343 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon Gold 5215 or AMD EPYC 7343 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5215 has 10 cores with 20 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. Up to 1024 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Gold 5215 was released in Q2/2019. The AMD EPYC 7343 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7343 was released in Q1/2021. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold (163) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5200/6200 (55) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7003 (29) |
| 2 | Generation | 3 |
| Cascade Lake | Architecture | Milan (Zen 3) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon Gold 5215 has 10 CPU cores and can calculate 20 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Gold 5215 is 2.50 GHz (3.40 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7343 has 16 CPU cores and 32 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7343 is at 3.20 GHz (3.90 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 5215 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7343 |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.90 GHz |
| 2.50 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.60 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon Gold 5215 can use up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 128.1 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7343 supports up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 204.8 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 5215 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7343 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 1024 GB | Max. Memory | 4096 GB |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 128.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 13.75 MB | L3 Cache | 128.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 48 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 47.3 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon Gold 5215 is 85 W, while the AMD EPYC 7343 has a TDP of 190 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 5215 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7343 |
| 85 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 190 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 200 W |
| -- | TDP down | 165 W |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon Gold 5215 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 13.75 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7343 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 128.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 5215 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7343 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | SP3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q1/2021 |
| 1221 $ | Release price | 1565 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
10C 20T @ 2.50 GHz (3.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5215
10C 20T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5215
10C 20T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5215
10C 20T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5215
10C 20T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5215 | AMD EPYC 7343 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
