Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 vs AMD EPYC 7702P
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 | AMD EPYC 7702P | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E5-2609 v4 or AMD EPYC 7702P - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz. Up to 1536 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 was released in Q1/2016. The AMD EPYC 7702P has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702P was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5 (71) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon E5 v4 (24) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 6 | Generation | 2 |
| Broadwell E | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.70 GHz. The AMD EPYC 7702P has 64 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| 8 | Cores | 64 |
| 8 | Threads | 128 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.70 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.35 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.50 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 supports a maximum of 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702P can connect up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| DDR4-1866 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 1536 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 59.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 20.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 has a TDP of 85 W, that of the AMD EPYC 7702P is 200 W. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| 85 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 200 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 has a 20.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 7702P cache has a total of 256.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | SP3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2016 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| 310 $ | Release price | 7500 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
8C 8T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
