Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 vs AMD EPYC 7702
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 | AMD EPYC 7702 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E5-2603 v4 or AMD EPYC 7702 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz. Up to 1536 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 was released in Q1/2016. The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5 (71) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon E5 v4 (24) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 6 | Generation | 2 |
| Broadwell E | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 6 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 is 1.70 GHz while the AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 CPU cores and 128 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7702 is at 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| 6 | Cores | 64 |
| 6 | Threads | 128 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.70 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.35 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.50 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 can use up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 59.8 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7702 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| DDR4-1866 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 1536 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 59.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 15.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 is 85 W, while the AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| 85 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 200 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 15.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7702 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | SP3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2016 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| 210 $ | Release price | 8000 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
6C 6T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
