Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Core i3-1005G1 | AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | |
CPU comparisonIntel Core i3-1005G1 or AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Core i3-1005G1 has 2 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i3-1005G1 was released in Q3/2019. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has 2 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U was released in Q1/2020. |
||
| Intel Core i3 | Family | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Intel Core i 1000G/10000U | CPU group | AMD Ryzen 3000U |
| 10 | Generation | 2 |
| Ice Lake U | Architecture | Dali (Zen+) |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Core i3-1005G1 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Core i3-1005G1 is 1.20 GHz (3.40 GHz) while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has 2 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is at --. |
||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.60 GHz |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.50 GHz |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.60 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Core i3-1005G1 or AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake G1) | GPU | AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics |
| 0.30 GHz | GPU frequency | 1.00 GHz |
| 0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | |
| 11 | GPU Generation | 8 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| 64 | Execution units | 3 |
| 512 | Shader | 192 |
| 32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Core i3-1005G1 can use up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 59.6 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U supports up to 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 38.4 GB/s. |
||
| DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | Memory | |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | 32 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 59.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| L2 Cache | 1.00 MB | |
| 4.00 MB | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 8 |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Core i3-1005G1 is 15 W, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has a TDP of 15 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| 15 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 15 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 25 W |
| 13 W | TDP down | 12 W |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | 95 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Core i3-1005G1 is manufactured in 10 nm and has 4.00 MB cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 4.00 MB cache. |
||
| 10 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| BGA 1526 | Socket | FP5 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Q3/2019 | Release date | Q1/2020 |
| 281 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 4T @ 1.20 GHz (3.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake G1) @ 0.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics @ 1.00 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Core i3-1005G1 | AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | Acer Aspire 3 (A314-22-R0YJ) ASUS VivoBook 15 F512DA (90NB0LZ3-M22030) Laptops |
VS Description of the processor
Here, the Intel Core i3-1005G1 and the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U 2 processors from the field of mobile devices, i.e. laptops, are compared.Both processors are dual-core processors that support hyperthreading and are equipped with an internal graphics unit.
The base clock frequency of the Intel Core i3-1005G1 is 1.20 gigahertz, which increases to up to 3.40 gigahertz in turbo mode. The base clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is 2.60 gigahertz and here the maximum turbo clock is up to 3.50 gigahertz. In the benchmarks, the performance of the Intel processor is around 20% ahead of the comparison processor from Intel.
The Intel UHD Graphics (generation Ice Lake G1) is used in the Intel Core i3-1005G1. This iGPU has 64 execution and 512 shader units. Furthermore, the graphics unit clocks at up to 0.90 gigahertz in turbo mode and offers the option of supplying up to 3 monitors with one image. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U uses an AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics, which has 3 execution units and 192 shader units. The clock rate of this iGPU is 1.00 gigahertz and also allows up to 3 monitors to be operated in parallel.
The Intel Core i3-1005G1, manufactured using the 10 nanometer process, is based on the Ice Lake U architecture and supports DDR4-3200 or LPDDR4-3733 RAM. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is manufactured in the 14 nanometer process based on the Dali (Zen +) architecture and supports DDR4-2400 type RAM via its 2 available memory channels.
Both processors have an integrated TDP of 15 watts and PCI Express version 3. The Intel Core i3-1005G1 has 16 PCIe lines, whereas the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has to make do with 8 lines.
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
