Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron N2910
33 %
4C / 4T · 1.60 GHz
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.83 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N2910
37 %
4C / 4T · 1.60 GHz
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.83 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Core2 Quad (19) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 (16) |
| Architecture | Bay Trail | Yorkfield (Penryn) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 1.60 GHz | 2.83 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | ||
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.31 - 0.76 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 22 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7.5 W | 95 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4.5 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q3/2009 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N2910 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N2910
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
