Intel Celeron G5925 vs Samsung Exynos 980

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron G5925 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 980
Intel Celeron G5925 Samsung Exynos 980

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron G5925 and the Samsung Exynos 980 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Celeron G5925 2 core processor released in Q3/2020 with the Samsung Exynos 980 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2019.
Intel Celeron (165) Family Samsung Exynos (46)
Intel Celeron G5000 (8) CPU group Samsung Exynos 980 (1)
9 Generation 4
Comet Lake S Architecture Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
Intel Celeron G5920 Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron G5925 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.60 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 980 clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Intel Celeron G5925 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 980
2 Cores 8
2 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.60 GHz A-Core 2.20 GHz
2x Cortex-A77
-- B-Core 1.80 GHz
6x Cortex-A55

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Celeron G5925 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 980
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel HD Graphics 610 GPU ARM Mali-G76 MP5
0.35 GHz GPU frequency 0.72 GHz
1.05 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.72 GHz
9.5 GPU Generation Bifrost 3
14 nm Technology 7 nm
3 Max. displays 2
12 Compute units 5
96 Shader 80
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
32 GB Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
12 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics 610 GPU ARM Mali-G76 MP5
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 128 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron G5925, while the Samsung Exynos 980 supports a maximum of 12 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

Intel Celeron G5925 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 980
DDR4-2666 Memory LPDDR4X-1866
128 GB Max. Memory 12 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
42.7 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache 2.00 MB
4.00 MB L3 Cache --
3.0 PCIe version --
16 PCIe lanes --
15.8 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Celeron G5925 has a TDP of 58 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 980 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Celeron G5925 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 980
58 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron G5925 has 4.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 980 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 8 nm.

Intel Celeron G5925 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 980
14 nm Technology 8 nm
Monolithic Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions --
LGA 1200 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux Operating systems Android
Q3/2020 Release date Q4/2019
52 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron G5925 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 980 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron G5925 Intel Celeron G5925
Intel HD Graphics 610 @ 1.05 GHz
202 (78%)
Samsung Exynos 980 Samsung Exynos 980
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 @ 0.72 GHz
260 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G5925 Intel Celeron G5925
2C 2T @ 3.60 GHz
928 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 980 Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G5925 Intel Celeron G5925
2C 2T @ 3.60 GHz
1725 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 980 Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Celeron G5925 Intel Celeron G5925
2C 2T @ 3.60 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 980 Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
330665 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron G5925 Intel Celeron G5925
2C 2T @ 3.60 GHz
2810 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 980 Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron G5925 Samsung Exynos 980
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Samsung Exynos 980Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GSamsung Exynos 980 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 980
3. Samsung Exynos 980Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
4. Samsung Exynos 980Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
5. Samsung Exynos 980Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
6. Intel Celeron G5925Intel Celeron G5905 Intel Celeron G5925 vs Intel Celeron G5905
7. Samsung Exynos 980Apple A11 Bionic Samsung Exynos 980 vs Apple A11 Bionic
8. Intel Celeron G5925Intel Pentium Gold G6405 Intel Celeron G5925 vs Intel Pentium Gold G6405
9. Samsung Exynos 980Samsung Exynos 7570 Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 7570
10. AMD Athlon 3000GIntel Celeron G5925 AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Celeron G5925


back to index