Intel Celeron G5900E | Samsung Exynos 7270 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron G5900E or Samsung Exynos 7270 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron G5900E has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron G5900E was released in Q2/2020. The Samsung Exynos 7270 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7270 was released in Q3/2016. |
||
Intel Celeron (165) | Family | Samsung Exynos (46) |
Intel Celeron G5000 (8) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 7570/7870/7880 (4) |
9 | Generation | 1 |
Comet Lake S | Architecture | Cortex-A53 |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
-- | Predecessor | -- |
Intel Celeron G6900E | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron G5900E has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron G5900E is 3.20 GHz while the Samsung Exynos 7270 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 7270 is at 1.00 GHz. |
||
Intel Celeron G5900E | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7270 |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
normal | Core architecture | normal |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
3.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.00 GHz |
-- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
-- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Celeron G5900E or Samsung Exynos 7270 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
Intel HD Graphics 610 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
0.35 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz |
1.00 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
9.5 | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
14 nm | Technology | 28nm |
3 | Max. displays | 2 |
12 | Compute units | 1 |
96 | Shader | 16 |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
12 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
Intel HD Graphics 610 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec AV1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron G5900E can use up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 38.4 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 7270 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
Intel Celeron G5900E | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7270 |
DDR4-2400 | Memory | LPDDR3-667 |
128 GB | Max. Memory | |
2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
38.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
No | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
15.8 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron G5900E is 58 W, while the Samsung Exynos 7270 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
Intel Celeron G5900E | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7270 |
58 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron G5900E is manufactured in 14 nm and has 2.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 7270 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
Intel Celeron G5900E | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7270 |
14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | -- |
LGA 1200 | Socket | -- |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
Yes | AES-NI | No |
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
Q2/2020 | Release date | Q3/2016 |
53 $ | Release price | -- |
show more data | show more data | |
Intel Celeron G5900E
Intel HD Graphics 610 @ 1.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 7270
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz |
Intel Celeron G5900E
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G5900E
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G5900E
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G5900E
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G5900E
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G5900E
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
Intel Celeron G5900E | Samsung Exynos 7270 |
Unknown | Unknown |