Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron E1200 vs Intel Pentium N3700
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron E1200
75 %
2C / 2T · 1.60 GHz
Intel Pentium N3700
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron E1200
39 %
2C / 2T · 1.60 GHz
Intel Pentium N3700
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E1200 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Pentium (150) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron E1000 (4) | Intel Pentium J3000/N3700 (3) |
| Architecture | Conroe (Core) | Braswell |
| Technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 775 | BGA 1170 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E1200 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x Core | 4x |
| Frequency: | 1.60 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.40 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.40 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 0.50 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E1200 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel HD Graphics 405 (16EU) |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 0.70 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 16 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q2/2015 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E1200 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E1200 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E1200 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 6 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4 W | |
| T. junction max. | 90 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E1200 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q1/2008 | Q2/2015 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron E1200 is 3.5 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Pentium N3700 has received 4.1 stars (32 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
Intel Pentium N3700
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
9
Intel Celeron E1200
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
