Intel Celeron 3755U vs Intel Atom E3827

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron 3755U CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Atom E3827
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Atom E3827

CPU comparison

Intel Celeron 3755U or Intel Atom E3827 ? In this comparison, we check which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Celeron 3755U has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 (Dual Channel) memory channels. The Intel Celeron 3755U was released in Q1/2015.

The Intel Atom E3827 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.75 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 (Single Channel) memory channels. The Intel Atom E3827 was released in Q4/2013.
Intel Celeron Family Intel Atom
Intel Celeron 3000 CPU group Intel Atom E3800
7 Generation 4
Kaby Lake U Architecture Bay Trail
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In addition to the number of CPU cores and threads, you can see here whether the Intel Celeron 3755U or Intel Atom E3827 can be overclocked. You will also find the clock frequencies of the processor (single-core and multi-core) here. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor.

2 Cores 2
2 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.70 GHz Frequency 1.75 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Internal Graphics

The Intel Celeron 3755U or Intel Atom E3827 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. A processor with integrated graphics is also called APU (Accelerated Processing Unit).

Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
0.10 GHz GPU frequency 0.54 GHz
0.80 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.79 GHz
8 GPU Generation 7
14 nm Technology 22 nm
3 Max. displays 2
12 Execution units 4
96 Shader 32
2 GB Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
11.2 DirectX Version 11.2

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
Decode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode Codec JPEG Decode

Memory & PCIe

The memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the processor. The memory bandwidth depends on several factors and is given in gigabytes per second.

DDR3-1600 Memory DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
-- Bandwidth --
No ECC No
L2 Cache
2.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version
12 PCIe lanes

Thermal Management

The Thermal Design Power (TDP for short) specifies the necessary cooling solution to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually only gives a rough idea of the real consumption of a CPU.

15 W TDP (PL1) 8 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

Here you will find information on the size of the level 2 and level 3 cache of the Intel Celeron 3755U or Intel Atom E3827 as well as a list of the processors ISA extensions. We have documented the architecture and the manufacturing technology for you as well as the release date.

14 nm Technology 22 nm
Monolithic Chip design Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
BGA 1168 Socket BGA 1170
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems
Q1/2015 Release date Q4/2013
-- Release price --
show more data show more data



iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) @ 0.80 GHz
154 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz
51 (33%)
Show all iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS) results



Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
1479 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
2C 2T @ 1.75 GHz
849 (57%)
Show all Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark results



Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
69 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
2C 2T @ 1.75 GHz
0 (0%)
Show all Cinebench R15 (Single-Core) results



Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
133 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
2C 2T @ 1.75 GHz
0 (0%)
Show all Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core) results



Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
1693 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
2C 2T @ 1.75 GHz
810 (48%)
Show all Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core) results



Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
2893 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
2C 2T @ 1.75 GHz
1475 (51%)
Show all Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core) results



Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
0.81 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
2C 2T @ 1.75 GHz
0 (0%)
Show all Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core) results



Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
1.55 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
2C 2T @ 1.75 GHz
0 (0%)
Show all Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core) results



Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) @ 0.80 GHz
14.9 (100%)
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3827
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz
0 (0%)
Show all Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL) results



Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Atom E3827
Unknown Unknown

Leaderboards

In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.


Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Atom E3827Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Atom E3845
2. Intel Atom E3815Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3815 vs Intel Atom E3827
3. Intel Celeron 3755UIntel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron 3755U vs Intel Celeron J1900
4. Intel Atom E3827Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Atom E3825
5. Intel Core i7-3517UIntel Atom E3827 Intel Core i7-3517U vs Intel Atom E3827
6. AMD A4-1250Intel Atom E3827 AMD A4-1250 vs Intel Atom E3827
7. Intel Celeron 3755UIntel Atom E3827 Intel Celeron 3755U vs Intel Atom E3827
8. Intel Atom E3827Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Celeron N2940
9. Intel Celeron 3755UAMD A6-4400M Intel Celeron 3755U vs AMD A6-4400M
10. AMD Phenom II X3 B77Intel Atom E3827 AMD Phenom II X3 B77 vs Intel Atom E3827
11. Intel Core i5-4350UIntel Celeron 3755U Intel Core i5-4350U vs Intel Celeron 3755U
12. Intel Core i7-2600KIntel Atom E3827 Intel Core i7-2600K vs Intel Atom E3827
13. Intel Core i5-4460SIntel Celeron 3755U Intel Core i5-4460S vs Intel Celeron 3755U
14. Intel Celeron 3765UIntel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3765U vs Intel Celeron 3755U
15. Intel Core i3-3210Intel Atom E3827 Intel Core i3-3210 vs Intel Atom E3827


back to index