Intel Celeron 1047UE vs AMD EPYC 7352

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron 1047UE CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7352
Intel Celeron 1047UE AMD EPYC 7352

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron 1047UE and the AMD EPYC 7352 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Celeron 1047UE 2 core processor released in Q1/2013 with the AMD EPYC 7352 which has 24 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2019.
Intel Celeron (165) Family AMD EPYC (129)
Intel Celeron 1000 (9) CPU group AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
3 Generation 2
Ivy Bridge U Architecture Rome (Zen 2)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron 1047UE is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.40 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 7352 clocks with 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz), has 24 CPU cores and can calculate 48 threads in parallel.

Intel Celeron 1047UE Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
2 Cores 24
2 Threads 48
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
1.40 GHz Frequency 2.30 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.20 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 2.70 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Celeron 1047UE Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) GPU no iGPU
0.35 GHz GPU frequency --
0.90 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
7 GPU Generation --
22 nm Technology
3 Max. displays
6 Compute units --
48 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11.0 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron 1047UE, while the AMD EPYC 7352 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled.

Intel Celeron 1047UE Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
DDR3L-1600, DDR3-1600 Memory DDR4-3200
16 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
25.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Yes ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 128.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version 4.0
16 PCIe lanes 128
8.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 252.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Intel Celeron 1047UE has a TDP of 17 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 7352 is 155 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Celeron 1047UE Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
17 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 155 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
105 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 22 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 7352 is at 128.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm.

Intel Celeron 1047UE Characteristic AMD EPYC 7352
22 nm Technology 7 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
BGA 1023 Socket SP3
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2013 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price 2750 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 1047UE to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7352 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1047UE (0%)
AMD EPYC 7352 (0%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1047UE (2%)
AMD EPYC 7352 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron 1047UE Intel Celeron 1047UE
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz
750 (2%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz
41286 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 1047UE Intel Celeron 1047UE
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
861 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron 1047UE Intel Celeron 1047UE
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz
15345 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 1047UE Intel Celeron 1047UE
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
375 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron 1047UE Intel Celeron 1047UE
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 0.90 GHz
86 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 7352
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron 1047UE AMD EPYC 7352
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 7352AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 7402
2. Intel Xeon Silver 4110AMD EPYC 7352 Intel Xeon Silver 4110 vs AMD EPYC 7352
3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD EPYC 7352 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD EPYC 7352
4. Intel Xeon Platinum 8160AMD EPYC 7352 Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 vs AMD EPYC 7352
5. AMD EPYC 7352AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
6. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300AMD EPYC 7352 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs AMD EPYC 7352
7. AMD Ryzen 3 3300UAMD EPYC 7352 AMD Ryzen 3 3300U vs AMD EPYC 7352
8. Intel Core i5-6200UAMD EPYC 7352 Intel Core i5-6200U vs AMD EPYC 7352
9. AMD Ryzen 5 2600Intel Celeron 1047UE AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Celeron 1047UE
10. AMD E2-3000AMD EPYC 7352 AMD E2-3000 vs AMD EPYC 7352


back to index