HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 970 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
HiSilicon Kirin 970 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 970 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 970 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. Up to 8 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 was released in Q3/2017.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 was released in Q2/2019.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family Intel Xeon Platinum (89)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1) CPU group Intel Xeon Platinum 8200/9200 (21)
6 Generation 2
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Cascade Lake
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 970 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 has 24 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz (3.90 GHz).

HiSilicon Kirin 970 Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
8 Cores 24
8 Threads 48
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.40 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
A-Core 2.40 GHz (3.90 GHz)
1.84 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

HiSilicon Kirin 970 Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-G72 MP12 GPU no iGPU
0.75 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation --
16 nm Technology
1 Max. displays
12 Compute units --
192 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G72 MP12 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 970 supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 can connect up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels.

HiSilicon Kirin 970 Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
LPDDR4X-2133 Memory DDR4-2933
8 GB Max. Memory 1024 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 6 (Hexa Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 140.7 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 35.75 MB
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 48
-- PCIe Bandwidth 47.3 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a TDP of 9 W, that of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 is 165 W.

HiSilicon Kirin 970 Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
9 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 165 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a 2.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 cache has a total of 35.75 MB.

HiSilicon Kirin 970 Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
10 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
-- Socket LGA 3647
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2017 Release date Q2/2019
-- Release price 4702 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 970 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 970 (31%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
349 (31%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz
1131 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
1455 (8%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz
18863 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz
366 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 @ 0.75 GHz
330 (100%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz
29369 (100%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 970 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
Huawei Honor 10
Huawei Note 10
Huawei Play
Huawei Honor View 10
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Huawei P20
Huawei Nova 3
Huawei Nova 4
Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
3. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
4. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GHiSilicon Kirin 970 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888HiSilicon Kirin 970 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 870HiSilicon Kirin 970 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845HiSilicon Kirin 970 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
9. HiSilicon Kirin 810HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
10. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G


back to index