HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs AMD Athlon II X4 641

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 955 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD Athlon II X4 641
HiSilicon Kirin 955 AMD Athlon II X4 641

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 955 or AMD Athlon II X4 641 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 955 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 was released in Q2/2016.

The AMD Athlon II X4 641 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Athlon II X4 641 was released in Q1/2012.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family AMD Athlon II (52)
HiSilicon Kirin 950 (2) CPU group AMD Athlon II X4 (Llano) (5)
4 Generation 2
Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Llano
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 955 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz. The AMD Athlon II X4 641 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz.

HiSilicon Kirin 955 Characteristic AMD Athlon II X4 641
8 Cores 4
8 Threads 4
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz
4x Cortex-A72
A-Core 2.80 GHz
1.80 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

HiSilicon Kirin 955 Characteristic AMD Athlon II X4 641
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-T880 MP4 GPU no iGPU
0.90 GHz GPU frequency --
0.90 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
Midgard 4 GPU Generation --
16 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
4 Compute units --
64 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
11 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-T880 MP4 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 955 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Athlon II X4 641 can connect up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

HiSilicon Kirin 955 Characteristic AMD Athlon II X4 641
LPDDR4, LPDDR3 Memory DDR3-1333
Max. Memory 16 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache 4.00 MB
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD Athlon II X4 641 is 100 W.

HiSilicon Kirin 955 Characteristic AMD Athlon II X4 641
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 100 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD Athlon II X4 641 cache has a total of 4.00 MB.

HiSilicon Kirin 955 Characteristic AMD Athlon II X4 641
16 nm Technology 32 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions MMX, 3DNow!, SSE3, SSE4a
-- Socket FM1
None Virtualization AMD-V
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2016 Release date Q1/2012
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 955 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD Athlon II X4 641 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 955 (85%)
AMD Athlon II X4 641 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 955 (70%)
AMD Athlon II X4 641 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 955 HiSilicon Kirin 955
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
330 (85%)
AMD Athlon II X4 641 AMD Athlon II X4 641
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz
388 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 955 HiSilicon Kirin 955
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
989 (70%)
AMD Athlon II X4 641 AMD Athlon II X4 641
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz
1421 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 955 HiSilicon Kirin 955
ARM Mali-T880 MP4 @ 0.90 GHz
122 (100%)
AMD Athlon II X4 641 AMD Athlon II X4 641
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 955 HiSilicon Kirin 955
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Athlon II X4 641 AMD Athlon II X4 641
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz
2279 (100%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 955 AMD Athlon II X4 641
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 810HiSilicon Kirin 955 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
2. HiSilicon Kirin 955Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855HiSilicon Kirin 955 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
4. HiSilicon Kirin 955Samsung Exynos 7570 HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Samsung Exynos 7570
5. Samsung Exynos 8890HiSilicon Kirin 955 Samsung Exynos 8890 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
6. HiSilicon Kirin 955Samsung Exynos 9820 HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
7. HiSilicon Kirin 955Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
8. HiSilicon Kirin 955Intel Atom x6200FE HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Intel Atom x6200FE
9. HiSilicon Kirin 955Intel Xeon W-2155 HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Intel Xeon W-2155
10. HiSilicon Kirin 955Intel Celeron 1020E HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Intel Celeron 1020E


back to index