HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 9000 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 810
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 810

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 or HiSilicon Kirin 810 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.13 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 was released in Q4/2020.

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 810 was released in Q2/2019.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (2) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 810/820 (3)
9 Generation 6
Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 Architecture Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is 3.13 GHz while the HiSilicon Kirin 810 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 810 is at 2.20 GHz.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 810
8 Cores 8
8 Threads 8
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.13 GHz
1x Cortex-A77
A-Core 2.20 GHz
2x Cortex-A76
2.54 GHz
3x Cortex-A77
B-Core 1.90 GHz
6x Cortex-A55
2.05 GHz
4x Cortex-A55
C-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 810
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 or HiSilicon Kirin 810 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

ARM Mali-G78 MP24 GPU ARM Mali-G52 MP6
0.76 GHz GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Vallhall 2 GPU Generation Bifrost 2
5 nm Technology 12 nm
1 Max. displays 2
24 Compute units 16
384 Shader 288
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
12 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G78 MP24 GPU ARM Mali-G52 MP6
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 can use up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The HiSilicon Kirin 810 supports up to 6 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 810
LPDDR5-2750, LPDDR4X-2133 Memory LPDDR4X-2133
Max. Memory 6 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 1.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is --, while the HiSilicon Kirin 810 has a TDP of 5 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 810
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 5 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is manufactured in 5 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 810
5 nm Technology 7 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Android
Q4/2020 Release date Q2/2019
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.0 stars (4 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 810 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
1063 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 810
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
592 (56%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
3767 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 810
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1898 (50%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
ARM Mali-G78 MP24 @ 0.76 GHz
2332 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 810
ARM Mali-G52 MP6 @ 0.85 GHz
122 (5%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
683679 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 810
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
301946 (44%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 810
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
772 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 810
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
2035 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 810
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
338464 (100%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 810
Unknown Huawei Honor 9X Pro
Huawei Honor Play 4T Pro
Huawei MatePad 10.4
Huawei Nova 5i Pro
Huawei P40 Lite

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2. HiSilicon Kirin 9000Apple A14 Bionic HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Apple A14 Bionic
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GHiSilicon Kirin 810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GHiSilicon Kirin 810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GHiSilicon Kirin 810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
7. HiSilicon Kirin 9000Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
8. HiSilicon Kirin 810Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
9. Apple M1HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Apple M1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
10. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810


back to index