HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs AMD A10-6700T

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 658 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD A10-6700T
HiSilicon Kirin 658 AMD A10-6700T

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 658 or AMD A10-6700T - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 was released in Q2/2016.

The AMD A10-6700T has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD A10-6700T was released in Q3/2013.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family AMD A (112)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) CPU group AMD A10-6000 (4)
4 Generation 3
Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Richland (Piledriver)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.35 GHz. The AMD A10-6700T has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz).
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD A10-6700T
8 Cores 4
8 Threads 4
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.35 GHz
4x Cortex-A53		 A-Core 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53		 B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD A10-6700T
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU AMD Radeon HD 8650D
0.90 GHz GPU frequency 0.72 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Midgard 4 GPU Generation 5
28nm Technology 32 nm
2 Max. displays 2
2 Compute units 6
32 Shader 384
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
11 DirectX Version 11.2

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU AMD Radeon HD 8650D
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD A10-6700T can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD A10-6700T
LPDDR3-933 Memory DDR3-1866
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 29.9 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 4.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD A10-6700T is 45 W.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD A10-6700T
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 45 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD A10-6700T cache has a total of 4.00 MB.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD A10-6700T
16 nm Technology 32 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
-- Socket FM2
None Virtualization AMD-V
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2016 Release date Q3/2013
-- Release price 125 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 658 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD A10-6700T to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz
61 (11%)
AMD A10-6700T AMD A10-6700T
AMD Radeon HD 8650D @ 0.72 GHz
553 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
183 (100%)
AMD A10-6700T AMD A10-6700T
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
815 (100%)
AMD A10-6700T AMD A10-6700T
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD A10-6700T AMD A10-6700T
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz
3853 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD A10-6700T AMD A10-6700T
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz
50 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD A10-6700T AMD A10-6700T
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz
201 (100%)

Devices using this processor
HiSilicon Kirin 658 AMD A10-6700T
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD A10-6700AMD A10-6700T AMD A10-6700 vs AMD A10-6700T
2. Intel Core i7-4785TAMD A10-6700T Intel Core i7-4785T vs AMD A10-6700T
3. AMD A10-6700TAMD A10-5700 AMD A10-6700T vs AMD A10-5700
4. AMD A10-6700TIntel Core i5-4590T AMD A10-6700T vs Intel Core i5-4590T
5. Intel Core i3-4130TAMD A10-6700T Intel Core i3-4130T vs AMD A10-6700T
6. Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2AMD A10-6700T Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2 vs AMD A10-6700T
7. Intel Core i5-4690TAMD A10-6700T Intel Core i5-4690T vs AMD A10-6700T
8. AMD A10-6700TAMD A10-6800K AMD A10-6700T vs AMD A10-6800K
9. Intel Core i3-4350TAMD A10-6700T Intel Core i3-4350T vs AMD A10-6700T
10. Intel Core i3-3245AMD A10-6700T Intel Core i3-3245 vs AMD A10-6700T


back to index