Apple A10X Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 8895

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Apple A10X Fusion CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 8895
Apple A10X Fusion Samsung Exynos 8895

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Apple A10X Fusion and the Samsung Exynos 8895 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Apple A10X Fusion 6 core processor released in Q2/2017 with the Samsung Exynos 8895 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2017.
Apple A series (22) Family Samsung Exynos (46)
Apple A10/A10X (2) CPU group Samsung Exynos 8895 (1)
10 Generation 2
A10 Architecture Exynos M2 / Cortex-A53
Mobile Segment Mobile
Apple A9X Predecessor --
Apple A12Z Bionic Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Apple A10X Fusion is a 6 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.36 GHz. The processor can compute 6 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 8895 clocks with 2.30 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Apple A10X Fusion Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
6 Cores 8
6 Threads 8
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.36 GHz
3x Hurricane
A-Core 2.30 GHz
4x Exynos M2 (Mongoose)
1.30 GHz
3x Zephyr
B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Apple A10X Fusion Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Apple A10X GPU ARM Mali-G71 MP20
1.00 GHz GPU frequency 0.90 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.90 GHz
7 GPU Generation Bifrost 1
10 nm Technology 16 nm
1 Max. displays 2
48 Compute units 20
384 Shader 320
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Apple A10X GPU ARM Mali-G71 MP20
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VP9 No
Decode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 3 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Apple A10X Fusion, while the Samsung Exynos 8895 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

Apple A10X Fusion Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
LPDDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR4-1866
3 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 0
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
8.00 MB L2 Cache 2.00 MB
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Apple A10X Fusion has a TDP of 8 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 8895 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Apple A10X Fusion Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
8 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Apple A10X Fusion has 8.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 10 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 8895 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm.

Apple A10X Fusion Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
10 nm Technology 10 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
iOS Operating systems Android
Q2/2017 Release date Q2/2017
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Apple A10X Fusion to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 8895 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
6C 6T @ 2.36 GHz
837 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
362 (43%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
6C 6T @ 2.36 GHz
2295 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1407 (61%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
6C 6T @ 2.36 GHz
954 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
421 (44%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
6C 6T @ 2.36 GHz
2354 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1367 (58%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
Apple A10X @ 1.00 GHz
768 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
ARM Mali-G71 MP20 @ 0.90 GHz
612 (80%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
6C 6T @ 2.36 GHz
377455 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
175045 (46%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
6C 6T @ 2.36 GHz
473856 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Apple A10X Fusion Apple A10X Fusion
6C 6T @ 2.36 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
3073 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Apple A10X Fusion Samsung Exynos 8895
Apple iPad Pro (2. Gen)
Apple TV 4K
Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Apple A10X FusionApple A12 Bionic Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A12 Bionic
2. Apple A10X FusionApple A14 Bionic Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A14 Bionic
3. Apple A10X FusionApple A13 Bionic Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A13 Bionic
4. Apple M1Apple A10X Fusion Apple M1 vs Apple A10X Fusion
5. Apple A10X FusionApple A10 Fusion Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A10 Fusion
6. Apple A10X FusionApple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
7. Apple A11 BionicApple A10X Fusion Apple A11 Bionic vs Apple A10X Fusion
8. Apple A10X FusionApple A12X Bionic Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A12X Bionic
9. Apple A10X FusionApple A12Z Bionic Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A12Z Bionic
10. Apple A10X FusionApple A9X Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A9X


back to index