AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Samsung Exynos 9609 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or Samsung Exynos 9609 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.50 GHz. Up to 2048 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X was released in Q4/2019. The Samsung Exynos 9609 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9609 was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper (13) | Family | Samsung Exynos (46) |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3000 (3) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) |
| 3 | Generation | 3 |
| Castle Peak (Zen 2) | Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a 32 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.70 GHz (4.50 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 9609 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. |
||
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 32 | Cores | 8 |
| 64 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.70 GHz (4.50 GHz) | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Bifrost 2 |
| Technology | 16 nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 3 |
| -- | Shader | 48 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X supports a maximum of 2048 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9609 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1600 |
| 2048 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 16.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| 128.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 126.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has a TDP of 280 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 9609 is --. |
||
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 280 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 95 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has a 144.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 9609 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| TRX4 (sTRX4) | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2019 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| 1969 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
32C 64T @ 3.70 GHz (4.50 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
