Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
V-Ray is a 3D rendering software from the manufacturer Chaos for designers and artists. Unlike many other render engines, V-Ray is capable of so-called hybrid rendering, in which the CPU and GPU work together at the same time.
However, the CPU benchmark we used (CPU Render Mode) only uses the system's processor. The working memory used plays a major role in the V-Ray benchmark. For our benchmarks we use the fastest RAM standard approved by the manufacturer (without overclocking).
Due to the high compatibility of V-Ray (including Autodesk 3ds Max, Maya, Cinema 4D, SketchUp, Unreal Engine and Blender), it is a frequently used software. With V-Ray, for example, photorealistic images can be rendered that laypeople cannot distinguish from normal photos.
The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible. Tested with
XMRig v6.x under the operation system HiveOS.
To trade Monero you can register with the crypto broker
Kraken.com. We've been customers there for a few years now and have been very satisfied so far.
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
If you look at this comparison, you really want to know. Here are 2 absolute high-end processors from AMD facing each other. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is aimed at the consumer market, but the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is more intended for professional use. But that doesn't mean that you can't use both processors at home, you just have to make sure that the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X requires a motherboard with socket AM4, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X requires one with socket TRX4.
The fact that the Threadripper processor once again increases equipment and performance starts with the processor cores. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X already has 16 physical cores, but the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X wades with 24 cores. Both processors support Hyper-Threading technology and can even be overclocked, although the clock frequencies are actually quite high:
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: 3.40 gigahertz (base clock frequency) / 4.90 gigahertz (maximum turbo clock)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X: 3.80 gigahertz (base clock frequency) / 4.50 gigahertz (maximum turbo clock)
In the single-core benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is then around 20% faster than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. This is due on the one hand to the slightly higher maximum clock frequency, but on the other hand also to the fact that the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is already based on the Zen 3 core architecture and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is still based on the older Zen 2 architecture.
In addition, the equipment of the Threadripper processor is significantly more extensive. It has 4 memory channels, can be operated with up to 2048 GB of RAM and has 72 PCIe lines! On the other hand, there is the Ryzen 9 processor, which has 2 memory channels with which it supports the operation of up to 128 gigabytes of RAM and "only" 20 PCIe lines are available.
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.