AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 or Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was released in Q3/2017. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 was released in Q3/2013. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO (21) | Family | Intel Xeon E5 (71) |
| AMD Ryzen 1000 (15) | CPU group | Intel Xeon E5 v2 (15) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Summit Ridge (Zen) | Architecture | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz) while the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 8 CPU cores and 16 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 is at 2.60 GHz (3.40 GHz). |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.60 GHz |
| 3.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.40 GHz |
| 3.30 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.00 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 can use up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 42.7 GB/s. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 supports up to 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR3-1600 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | 768 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 42.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 16.00 MB | L3 Cache | 20.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 40 |
| 19.7 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 39.4 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is 65 W, while the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 95 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 16.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 is manufactured in 22 nm and has a 20.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| AM4 (PGA 1331) | Socket | LGA 2011 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q3/2013 |
| 359 $ | Release price | 900 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz (3.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 5 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
8C 16T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
