In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H and the Intel Core i7-10750H and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 core processor released in Q2/2021 with the Intel Core i7-10750H which has 6 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2020.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz (4.40 GHz). The processor can compute 16 threads at the same time. The Intel Core i7-10750H clocks with 2.60 GHz (5.00 GHz), has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 12 threads in parallel.
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.
A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
Up to 64 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, while the Intel Core i7-10750H supports a maximum of 128 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s enabled.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has a TDP of 45 W. The TDP of the Intel Core i7-10750H is 45 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has 20.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Intel Core i7-10750H is at 12.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.
Here you can rate the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.6 stars (40 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Core i7-10750H to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.0 stars (3 ratings). Rate now:
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
The comparison between the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H and the Intel Core i7-10750H takes place in the premium notebook sector. Both processors are classified in the 45 watt TDP class and achieve a very high performance for mobile processors.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H leads the performance scale with a clock frequency of 3.2 GHz in the base and up to 4.4 GHz via Turbo. With a base frequency of 2.6 GHz, the Intel Core i7-10750H keys a little lower. In multi-core load scenarios, the Intel processor can increase its clock frequency up to 3.2 GHz (AMD: 3.8 GHz) - even though the AMD processor has 8 instead of 6 CPU cores. The Intel processor can only beat the AMD processor in single-core load scenarios, at least on paper: the Intel Core i7-10750H reaches up to 5.0 GHz here.
In single-core load scenarios, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H calculates approx. 20 percent faster than its counterpart from Intel. If all CPU cores are used to the full, for example in professional applications or games, the AMD processor achieves almost twice the performance of the Intel Core i7-10750H. This is mainly due to the 2 additional CPU cores and the more modern CPU architecture (Zen 3) of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H.
The Intel Core i7-10750H is still based on Intel's "Comet Lake H" architecture, which has a lower performance per clock than AMD's "Zen 3" CPU design. Only the newer Intel Tiger Lake (11th Gen) CPUs can catch up with AMD again. The manufacturing technology of the Intel processor also had a negative impact. Since the mobile processor is still manufactured in 14 nm, it gets quite hot over time and cannot maintain its clock frequency for a longer period of time.
AMD's mobile processor, on the other hand, is already manufactured with a structure width of 7 nm and is therefore not only more energy efficient, but can also keep the clock frequency stable over a longer period of time.