Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT vs AMD EPYC 7702
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | AMD EPYC 7702 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen 7 3800XT or AMD EPYC 7702 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.70 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT was released in Q2/2020. The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 (74) | Family | AMD EPYC (145) |
| AMD Ryzen 3000 (15) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 3 | Generation | 2 |
| Matisse (Zen 2) | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop | Segment | Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT is 4.20 GHz (4.70 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 CPU cores and 128 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7702 is at 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| 8 | Cores | 64 |
| 16 | Threads | 128 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 4.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 4.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.35 GHz |
| 4.50 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.50 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT can use up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7702 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 32.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT is 105 W, while the AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| 105 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 200 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 95 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured in 7 nm and has 32.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7702 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| AM4 (PGA 1331) | Socket | SP3 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2020 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 8000 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz (4.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 4 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 4 CPU benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a partial load benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. In the single-core test, only the fastest CPU core is measured. The test run simulates the performance in practice.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
The practical Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark tests the system's performance under partial load. The processor's maximum power consumption is far from being used up.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | AMD EPYC 7702 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
News and articles for the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT and the AMD EPYC 7702
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index