AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs AMD EPYC 7351

Last updated: 2024-04-12

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600		AMD EPYC 7351
CPU comparison AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 or AMD EPYC 7351 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was released in Q3/2017. The AMD EPYC 7351 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7351 was released in Q3/2017.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28)	Family	AMD EPYC (129)
AMD Ryzen 1000 (15)	CPU group	AMD EPYC 7001 (12)
1	Generation	1
Summit Ridge (Zen)	Architecture	Naples (Zen)
Desktop / Server	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a 6 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz). The AMD EPYC 7351 has 16 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz (2.90 GHz).
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7351
6	Cores	16
12	Threads	32
normal	Core architecture	normal
Yes	Hyperthreading	Yes
Yes	Overclocking ?	No
3.20 GHz	Frequency	2.40 GHz
3.60 GHz	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	2.90 GHz
3.40 GHz	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	2.90 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7351
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
--	GPU Generation	--
	Technology
	Max. displays
--	Compute units	--
--	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
--	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports a maximum of 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7351 can connect up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7351
DDR4-2666	Memory	DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666
64 GB	Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel)	Memory channels	8 (Octa Channel)
42.7 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	170.6 GB/s
Yes	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
16.00 MB	L3 Cache	64.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version	3.0
20	PCIe lanes	128
19.7 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	126.1 GB/s
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a TDP of 95 W, that of the AMD EPYC 7351 is 170 W.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7351
95 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	170 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
95 °C	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a 16.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 7351 cache has a total of 64.00 MB.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7351
14 nm	Technology	14 nm
Monolithic	Chip design	Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3	ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
AM4 (PGA 1331)	Socket	SP3
AMD-V, SVM	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
Yes	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2017	Release date	Q3/2017
300 $	Release price	850 $

show more data		show more data

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.40 GHz (2.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 (100%)

AMD EPYC 7351 (79%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 4 CPU benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 (58%)

AMD EPYC 7351 (85%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz	6230 (36%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	17401 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz	894 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	634 (71%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz	4970 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	2002 (40%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz	10330 (44%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	23569 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz	147 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	128 (87%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz	1094 (50%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	2184 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz	900 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	717 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	2022 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	296 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	4728 (100%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz	107 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7351 16C 32T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)

Devices using this processor
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600	AMD EPYC 7351
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD EPYC 7351P vs AMD EPYC 7351
2.		Intel Xeon Gold 6130 vs AMD EPYC 7351
3.		AMD EPYC 7351 vs AMD EPYC 7301
4.		AMD EPYC 7351 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4116
5.		AMD EPYC 7351 vs AMD EPYC 7451
6.		AMD EPYC 7351 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5118
7.		AMD EPYC 7351 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
8.		AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
9.		AMD Ryzen 5 1500X vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
10.		Intel Xeon Gold 6142 vs AMD EPYC 7351