AMD FX-8310 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD FX-8310 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
AMD FX-8310 HiSilicon Kirin 9000

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD FX-8310 and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD FX-8310 8 core processor released in Q3/2014 with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2020.
AMD FX (30) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
AMD FX-8000 (11) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (2)
2 Generation 9
Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD FX-8310 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.40 GHz (4.30 GHz). The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 clocks with 3.13 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

AMD FX-8310 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8 Cores 8
8 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
3.40 GHz (4.30 GHz) A-Core 3.13 GHz
1x Cortex-A77
-- B-Core 2.54 GHz
3x Cortex-A77
-- C-Core 2.05 GHz
4x Cortex-A55

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD FX-8310 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G78 MP24
GPU frequency 0.76 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Vallhall 2
Technology 5 nm
Max. displays 1
-- Compute units 24
-- Shader 384
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G78 MP24
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD FX-8310, while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD FX-8310 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
DDR3-1866 Memory LPDDR5-2750, LPDDR4X-2133
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
29.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
8.00 MB L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD FX-8310 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD FX-8310 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
95 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD FX-8310 has 8.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 5 nm.

AMD FX-8310 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
32 nm Technology 5 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 ISA extensions --
AM3+ Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q3/2014 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD FX-8310 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.6 stars (7 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-8310
8C 8T @ 4.30 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
1063 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-8310
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
3767 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-8310
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
ARM Mali-G78 MP24 @ 0.76 GHz
2332 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-8310
8C 8T @ 3.40 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
683679 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-8310
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz
9065 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-8310
8C 8T @ 4.30 GHz
98 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-8310
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz
665 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD FX-8310 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2. HiSilicon Kirin 9000Apple A14 Bionic HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Apple A14 Bionic
3. AMD FX-6300AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8310
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
5. HiSilicon Kirin 9000Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
6. Apple M1HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Apple M1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
7. AMD FX-8310AMD FX-8370E AMD FX-8310 vs AMD FX-8370E
8. AMD FX-8310AMD FX-8300 AMD FX-8310 vs AMD FX-8300
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
10. HiSilicon Kirin 9000Samsung Exynos 2100 HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 2100


back to index