AMD FX-8140 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD FX-8140 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700E | |
CPU comparisonAMD FX-8140 or AMD Ryzen 7 2700E - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD FX-8140 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-8140 was released in Q4/2012. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E was released in Q3/2018. |
||
| AMD FX (30) | Family | AMD Ryzen 7 (67) |
| AMD FX-8000 (11) | CPU group | AMD Ryzen 2000 (9) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Vishera (Bulldozer) | Architecture | Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD FX-8140 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz (4.10 GHz). The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz (4.00 GHz). |
||
| AMD FX-8140 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 7 2700E |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 3.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.80 GHz |
| 4.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.00 GHz |
| 4.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.20 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD FX-8140 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| AMD FX-8140 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 7 2700E |
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 29.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 19.7 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD FX-8140 has a TDP of 95 W, that of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E is 45 W. |
||
| AMD FX-8140 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 7 2700E |
| 95 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 45 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD FX-8140 has a 8.00 MB cache, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E cache has a total of 16.00 MB. |
||
| AMD FX-8140 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 7 2700E |
| 32 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Q4/2012 | Release date | Q3/2018 |
| -- | Release price | 290 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz (4.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 16T @ 2.80 GHz (4.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD FX-8140 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700E |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
