AMD FX-6200 vs Samsung Exynos 5433

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD FX-6200 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 5433
AMD FX-6200 Samsung Exynos 5433

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD FX-6200 and the Samsung Exynos 5433 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD FX-6200 6 core processor released in Q2/2012 with the Samsung Exynos 5433 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2014.
AMD FX (30) Family Samsung Exynos (46)
AMD FX-6100/6200 (3) CPU group Samsung Exynos 5433 (1)
1 Generation 1
Zambezi (Bulldozer) Architecture Cortex-A57 / Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD FX-6200 is a 6 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.80 GHz (4.10 GHz). The processor can compute 6 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 5433 clocks with 1.90 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5433
6 Cores 8
6 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
3.80 GHz (4.10 GHz) A-Core 1.90 GHz
4x Cortex-A57
-- B-Core 1.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5433
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T760 MP6
GPU frequency 0.70 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.70 GHz
-- GPU Generation Midgard 3
Technology 28nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 6
-- Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T760 MP6
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD FX-6200, while the Samsung Exynos 5433 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5433
DDR3-1866 Memory LPDDR3e-1066
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 0
29.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache 2.25 MB
8.00 MB L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD FX-6200 has a TDP of 125 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 5433 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5433
125 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD FX-6200 has 8.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 5433 is at 2.25 MB. The processor is manufactured in 20 nm.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5433
32 nm Technology 20 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX ISA extensions --
AM3+ Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2012 Release date Q3/2014
95 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD FX-6200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 5433 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 (48%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 (40%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
524 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz
250 (48%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
1992 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz
798 (40%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
183 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
836 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 Samsung Exynos 5433
ARM Mali-T760 MP6 @ 0.70 GHz
143 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
6180 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 3.80 GHz
987 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5433 Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD FX-6200 Samsung Exynos 5433
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD FX-6200AMD FX-8350 AMD FX-6200 vs AMD FX-8350
2. AMD Athlon II X2 340AMD FX-6200 AMD Athlon II X2 340 vs AMD FX-6200
3. AMD Phenom II X6 1100TAMD FX-6200 AMD Phenom II X6 1100T vs AMD FX-6200
4. AMD Phenom II X4 955AMD FX-6200 AMD Phenom II X4 955 vs AMD FX-6200
5. Intel Core i5-2500kAMD FX-6200 Intel Core i5-2500k vs AMD FX-6200
6. AMD Phenom II X6 1090TAMD FX-6200 AMD Phenom II X6 1090T vs AMD FX-6200
7. AMD A4-3320MAMD FX-6200 AMD A4-3320M vs AMD FX-6200
8. Intel Core i7-3770AMD FX-6200 Intel Core i7-3770 vs AMD FX-6200
9. Intel Pentium G2010AMD FX-6200 Intel Pentium G2010 vs AMD FX-6200
10. AMD A10-7850KAMD FX-6200 AMD A10-7850K vs AMD FX-6200


back to index