AMD FX-6100 vs Samsung Exynos 880
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD FX-6100 | Samsung Exynos 880 | |
CPU comparisonAMD FX-6100 or Samsung Exynos 880 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD FX-6100 has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-6100 was released in Q4/2011. The Samsung Exynos 880 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 880 was released in Q2/2020. |
||
| AMD FX (30) | Family | Samsung Exynos (46) |
| AMD FX-6100/6200 (3) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 800 (2) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Zambezi (Bulldozer) | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD FX-6100 is a 6 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.30 GHz (3.90 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 880 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. |
||
| AMD FX-6100 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.30 GHz (3.90 GHz) | A-Core | 2.00 GHz 2x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.80 GHz 6x Cortex-A55 |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Bifrost 3 |
| Technology | 7 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 5 |
| -- | Shader | 80 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD FX-6100 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 880 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| AMD FX-6100 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | LPDDR4X |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 29.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD FX-6100 has a TDP of 95 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 880 is --. |
||
| AMD FX-6100 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| 95 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD FX-6100 has a 8.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 880 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| AMD FX-6100 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | ISA extensions | -- |
| AM3+ | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2011 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
| 100 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
6C 6T @ 3.30 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD FX-6100
6C 6T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-6100
6C 6T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD FX-6100
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 @ 0.72 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD FX-6100
6C 6T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD FX-6100
6C 6T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD FX-6100
6C 6T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD FX-6100
6C 6T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-6100
6C 6T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD FX-6100 | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
