Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD FX-4100 vs UNISOC T700
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD FX-4100
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.80 GHz
UNISOC T700
75 %
8C / 8T · 1.80 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD FX-4100
96 %
4C / 4T · 3.80 GHz
UNISOC T700
100 %
8C / 8T · 1.80 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4100 | UNISOC T700 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD FX (30) | UNISOC 4G (10) |
| CPU group | AMD FX-4100/4200 (5) | UNISOC 4G 12nm (8) |
| Architecture | Zambezi (Bulldozer) | |
| Technology | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | AM3+ | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4100 | UNISOC T700 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x 3.60 - 3.80 GHz |
2x Cortex-A75 1.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 6x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4100 | UNISOC T700 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 2 / 32 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 16 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4100 | UNISOC T700 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4100 | UNISOC T700 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | LPDDR4X-1866 LPDDR4-1866 LPDDR3-933 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| Memory channels | 2 | 0 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4100 | UNISOC T700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4100 | UNISOC T700 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | |
| Release date | Q4/2011 | Q1/2021 |
| Release price | 90 $ | |
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD FX-4100 is 4.2 stars (14 ratings), while UNISOC T700 has received 3.7 stars (24 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
AMD FX-4100
4C / 4T · 3.80 GHz
9
UNISOC T700
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
