AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7702 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to 768 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 was released in Q3/2017. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Xeon Platinum (89) |
| AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | Intel Xeon Platinum 8100 (16) |
| 2 | Generation | 1 |
| Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Skylake |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7702 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). The Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 has 24 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.70 GHz (3.70 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 |
| 64 | Cores | 24 |
| 128 | Threads | 48 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.70 GHz |
| 3.35 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| 2.50 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.00 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7702 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 can connect up to 768 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. Memory | 768 GB | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 33.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 48 |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W, that of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 is 205 W. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 |
| 200 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 205 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7702 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 cache has a total of 33.00 MB. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| SP3 | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2019 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| 8000 $ | Release price | 5900 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
24C 48T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
