AMD EPYC 7702 | Intel Celeron 6305E | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7702 or Intel Celeron 6305E - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019. The Intel Celeron 6305E has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 6305E was released in Q4/2020. |
||
AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | Intel Celeron 6000 (2) |
2 | Generation | 11 |
Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Tiger Lake U |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
-- | Predecessor | -- |
-- | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7702 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). The Intel Celeron 6305E has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.80 GHz (1.80 GHz). |
||
AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 6305E |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
normal | Core architecture | normal |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
2.00 GHz | Frequency | 1.80 GHz |
3.35 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 1.80 GHz |
2.50 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 1.80 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake G4) |
GPU frequency | 0.30 GHz | |
-- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.25 GHz |
-- | GPU Generation | 11 |
Technology | 10 nm | |
Max. displays | 4 | |
-- | Compute units | 48 |
-- | Shader | 384 |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
-- | Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB |
-- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake G4) |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec VP9 | Decode |
No | Codec VP8 | Decode |
No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
No | Codec AVC | Decode |
No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7702 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 6305E can connect up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 6305E |
DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR4-3733, DDR4-3200 |
Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
Yes | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
128 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W, that of the Intel Celeron 6305E is 15 W. |
||
AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 6305E |
200 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 15 W |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
-- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7702 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the Intel Celeron 6305E cache has a total of 4.00 MB. |
||
AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 6305E |
7 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
SP3 | Socket | BGA 1449 |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | |
Q3/2019 | Release date | Q4/2020 |
8000 $ | Release price | 118 $ |
show more data | show more data | |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
@ 0.00 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake G4) @ 1.25 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
Intel Celeron 6305E
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
AMD EPYC 7702 | Intel Celeron 6305E |
Unknown | Unknown |