AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Atom E3805 Benchmark, comparison and differences


AMD EPYC 7702		Intel Atom E3805
CPU comparison AMD EPYC 7702 or Intel Atom E3805 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019. The Intel Atom E3805 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.33 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Intel Atom E3805 was released in Q4/2014.

AMD EPYC (129)	Family	Intel Atom (108)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24)	CPU group	Intel Atom E3800 (6)
2	Generation	4
Rome (Zen 2)	Architecture	Bay Trail
Desktop / Server	Segment	Mobile
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD EPYC 7702 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). The Intel Atom E3805 has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.33 GHz.
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	Intel Atom E3805
64	Cores	2
128	Threads	2
normal	Core architecture	normal
Yes	Hyperthreading	No
No	Overclocking ?	No
2.00 GHz	Frequency	1.33 GHz
3.35 GHz	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	--
2.50 GHz	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	--

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	Intel Atom E3805
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
--	GPU Generation	--
	Technology
	Max. displays
--	Compute units	--
--	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
--	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

AMD EPYC 7702 or Intel Atom E3805 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019.

The Intel Atom E3805 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.33 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Intel Atom E3805 was released in Q4/2014.

Memory & PCIe The AMD EPYC 7702 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Intel Atom E3805 can connect up to 8 GB of memory in 1 memory channels.
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	Intel Atom E3805
DDR4-3200	Memory	DDR3L-1066
	Max. Memory	8 GB
8 (Octa Channel)	Memory channels	1 (Single Channel)
51.2 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	8.6 GB/s
Yes	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
256.00 MB	L3 Cache	1.00 MB
4.0	PCIe version	2.0
128	PCIe lanes	4
252.0 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	2.0 GB/s
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W, that of the Intel Atom E3805 is 3 W.
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	Intel Atom E3805
200 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	3 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	110 °C
Technical details The AMD EPYC 7702 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the Intel Atom E3805 cache has a total of 1.00 MB.
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	Intel Atom E3805
7 nm	Technology	22 nm
Chiplet	Chip design	Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3	ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2
SP3	Socket	BGA 1170
AMD-V, SVM	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT
Yes	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems
Q3/2019	Release date	Q4/2014
8000 $	Release price	31 $

show more data		show more data

AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!

AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz)

buy now on Amazon and save!

Intel Atom E3805
2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz

buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks

AMD EPYC 7702 (100%)

Intel Atom E3805 (12%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

AMD EPYC 7702 (100%)

Intel Atom E3805 (1%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	1079 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	130 (12%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	37461 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	250 (1%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	70617 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	406 (1%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	996 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	49035 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	1317 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	391 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	18857 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	0 (0%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	403.9 (100%)
	Intel Atom E3805 2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz	0 (0%)

Devices using this processor
AMD EPYC 7702	Intel Atom E3805
Unknown	Unknown


1.		AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD EPYC 7702
2.		AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD EPYC 7702P
3.		Intel Xeon Gold 6140 vs AMD EPYC 7702
4.		AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
5.		AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD EPYC 7502
6.		AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
7.		AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7702
8.		AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6138F
9.		AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8176
10.		Intel Xeon Platinum 8380HL vs AMD EPYC 7702

AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Atom E3805

CPU comparison with benchmarks

CPU comparison

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Internal Graphics

Hardware codec support

Memory & PCIe

Thermal Management

Technical details