AMD EPYC 7532 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Last updated: 2023-09-12

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7532		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
CPU comparison AMD EPYC 7532 or AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The AMD EPYC 7532 has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7532 was released in Q1/2020. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X was released in Q2/2018.

AMD EPYC (129)	Family	AMD Ryzen 7 (67)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24)	CPU group	AMD Ryzen 2000 (9)
2	Generation	2
Rome (Zen 2)	Architecture	Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+)
Desktop / Server	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD EPYC 7532 has 32 CPU cores and can calculate 64 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7532 is 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz) while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has 8 CPU cores and 16 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is at 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz).
AMD EPYC 7532	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
32	Cores	8
64	Threads	16
normal	Core architecture	normal
Yes	Hyperthreading	Yes
No	Overclocking ?	Yes
2.40 GHz	Frequency	3.70 GHz
3.30 GHz	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	4.30 GHz
2.90 GHz	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	3.85 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD EPYC 7532	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The AMD EPYC 7532 or AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
--	GPU Generation	--
	Technology
	Max. displays
--	Compute units	--
--	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
--	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The AMD EPYC 7532 can use up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 46.9 GB/s.
AMD EPYC 7532	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
DDR4-3200	Memory	DDR4-2933
	Max. Memory	64 GB
8 (Octa Channel)	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
51.2 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	46.9 GB/s
Yes	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
256.00 MB	L3 Cache	16.00 MB
4.0	PCIe version	3.0
128	PCIe lanes	20
252.0 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	19.7 GB/s
Thermal Management The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7532 is 200 W, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has a TDP of 105 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
AMD EPYC 7532	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
200 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	105 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	95 °C
Technical details The AMD EPYC 7532 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 256.00 MB cache. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured in 12 nm and has a 16.00 MB cache.
AMD EPYC 7532	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
7 nm	Technology	12 nm
Chiplet	Chip design	Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3	ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
SP3	Socket	AM4 (PGA 1331)
AMD-V, SVM	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
Yes	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q1/2020	Release date	Q2/2018
3600 $	Release price	320 $

show more data		show more data

AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks

AMD EPYC 7532 (96%)

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks

AMD EPYC 7532 (100%)

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (38%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	1049 (99%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	1062 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	24679 (100%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	7100 (29%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	1246 (96%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	1294 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	12846 (100%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	6789 (53%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	386 (94%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	411 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	54674 (100%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	17588 (32%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	66 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	589 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	1071 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	9971 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	3951 (100%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	156 (100%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	211.2 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	457 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.40 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz	4799 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz	177 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz	1817 (100%)

Devices using this processor
AMD EPYC 7532	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Unknown	Captiva Workstation PC Ryzen 7 2700X Acer Nitro N50-100 Ryzen 7 2700X HP EliteDesk 705 G4 Workstation Edition MT Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (6TL46EA#ABD)

News and articles for the AMD EPYC 7532 and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

The evolution of AMD Ryzen processors

Posted by Stefan on 2022-09-06

The AMD Ryzen processors are designed for the mid to high-end range and are grouped into the Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 classes. AMD follows the market leader Intel, which groups its Core i series (Intel Core i3, Core i5, Core i7 and Core i9) identically.

The AMD Ryzen processors were first introduced by AMD in Q1 2017. They are the successor to the not particularly successful AMD Bulldozer processors. The latter were manufactured using an outdated manufacturing process and could not keep up with the competing products from Intel. AMD lost a large portion of its desktop processor market share during this period.

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
2.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
3.		AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
4.		AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
5.		AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
6.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-8700K
7.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700
8.		AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
9.		AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-9700K
10.		AMD Ryzen 7 5700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X